The Daily Telegraph

Aftershock­s pulling the royal cousins apart

As Harry and Meghan’s online update appears to contain a hidden dig at Princess Beatrice, Camilla Tominey assesses the fallout

-

With allegation­s over the Duke of York’s friendship with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein hanging over it like a dark cloud, Princess Beatrice’s wedding was never going to be an easy royal event to plan.

The small matter of how to cram all their nearest and dearest into the “cosy” 150-seat Chapel Royal was already proving difficult enough, but now Beatrice and her fiancé Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi face an even bigger conundrum: how to solve a problem like Harry and Meghan?

The acrimony between the newly exiled Sussexes and the Royal family has seemingly reached fever pitch over the weekend following the couple’s foot-stamping salvo over the loss of their “royal” status. If so, naturally the bride and groom want to avoid any ill-feeling on May 29.

The Sussexes have been accused of “losing all sense of perspectiv­e” after taking an extraordin­ary swipe at the Queen and other members of the Royal family in a sharply worded “update” on their website.

In a surprise twist, the broadside appeared to single out Beatrice and Eugenie, making the point that there was a precedent for “other titled members of the Royal family to seek employment outside of the institutio­n”, while Harry and Megan are subject to a 12-month review period as they seek financial independen­ce in North America.

Eugenie works as an art gallery director while Beatrice has a role with a tech start-up. Although they are both HRHS who occasional­ly carry out charitable engagement­s and accompany the Queen to royal events, unlike Harry and Meghan, neither has publicly funded bodyguards.

The thinly veiled criticism has shocked royal watchers – not least because Harry had previously been very close to the York sisters. As children, they enjoyed skiing holidays together when their mothers – Diana, Princess of Wales and Sarah, Duchess of York – were chummy during the Eighties and Nineties, and this carefree relationsh­ip carried on throughout their teens, extending into early adulthood. Yet this unexpected outburst suggests the rift between the Sussexes and the Windsors is now affecting once-strong cousinly bonds.

Although the invitation­s have not been sent out, there is no question that Harry and Meghan will be among the tight-knit guest list for the “low-key” ceremony and reception hosted by the Queen at Buckingham Palace.

Yet with tensions rising, a source close to the happy couple yesterday admitted that, while all members of the family had been informed of the date in advance of the formal “stiffies” being posted, there was still uncertaint­y over the Sussexes’ RSVP.

“Of course Harry and Meghan will be invited, but it is up to them whether or not they choose to attend,” they said.

“The trouble with Harry and Meghan is that they think they are bigger than the institutio­n,” said one friend of the Yorks. “It’s such a shame things have turned out like this.”

As with all family disputes, knotted internal politics are at play. If they choose to sidestep the big day, the Sussexes risk being accused of snubbing Beatrice and Edoardo, and upsetting the 93-year-old Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh, 98.

Yet if they attend, their appearance back in Britain for what could be the first time since they cease to be full-time working members of the Royal family on March 31, threatens to overshadow the proceeding­s, risking turning the wedding into the “Harry and Meghan show”. To complicate matters, the Sussexes do have form when it comes to upsetting the House of York over matrimonia­l matters.

Eugenie was described as “hurt” when Meghan announced her pregnancy to the rest of the Royal family at her wedding reception – before making the news public the day after the ceremony at St George’s Chapel, Windsor Castle, in 2018.

The bride and Jack Brooksbank, her new husband, were also said to be “put out” when Harry turned up alone at the evening reception at Royal Lodge reserved for closest friends and family, and then only stayed for one drink.

Although the newly-weds appreciate­d that the Sussexes were flying to Australia early the following morning for a royal tour, as one friend put it: “It’s fair to say the relationsh­ip is not what it was.”

The bond between all the cousins, but particular­ly Harry and Eugenie, was always strong. Eugenie was once described as sharing a “mischievou­s streak” with her “partner in crime” Harry – both having reputation­s in the family for their cheeky sense of humour and propensity to giggle during stuffy state occasions. As well as sharing in the trials and tribulatio­ns of living life in the royal spotlight, Beatrice, 31, and Eugenie, 29, who are closer in age to Harry, 35, than William, 38, have also long moved in the same social circles. It was Eugenie who introduced Harry to Cressida Bonas, his girlfriend before Meghan whom he dated from 2012 to 2014. “Cuz” or “Eug”, as she is affectiona­tely known to Harry, was rumoured to be among those who helped him get together with Meghan through mutual friends such as stylist Misha Nonoo, whose Rome wedding Beatrice and Eugenie attended along with Harry and Meghan in September.

Eugenie and Jack even stayed with the Sussexes at Meghan’s Toronto home to celebrate Hallowe’en in 2016 and for a while the couples were neighbours at Kensington Palace – Eugenie and Jack living in Ivy Cottage, with Harry and Meghan a few doors down at Nottingham Cottage.

Yet there have been simmering tensions between the Sussexes and the Yorks ever since Harry and Meghan chose not to invite Sarah, Duchess of York, to the evening reception of their Windsor wedding in May 2018. (She was not on the guest list for William and Kate’s 2011 wedding either, a snub she later said was “hard” because “I wanted to be there with my girls.”)

Fergie’s exclusion from Harry and Meghan’s Frogmore House bash came amid hurtful rumours that her nephew secretly suspected that she had been responsibl­e for leaking the story of his relationsh­ip with the American actress back in October 2016 – a claim she has strenuousl­y denied.

Sarah later hinted that it was the Queen who insisted that she at least be invited to the ceremony at St George’s Chapel, saying: “She leads by such example and to include me is a wonderful gesture,” before adding, diplomatic­ally: “I felt honoured and grateful for Harry and Meghan to invite me... It was very kind of them and I think I can’t thank them enough for doing that, because it was nerveracki­ng but I knew I was ready.”

Yet some of that goodwill was undone when sources close to the former Suits actress suggested she was “horrified” by the Duke of York’s car-crash Newsnight interview.

Meghan was said to be particular­ly put out by the Duke’s descriptio­n of sex as a “positive act” for men in the BBC interview with Emily Maitlis about his role in the Epstein scandal. Having worked with the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowermen­t of Women as an advocate, it is fair to say the sorry saga has not sat well with Meghan’s feminist credential­s.

The Yorks, meanwhile, insist that Andrew is innocent until proved guilty and should at the very least be able to count on his family’s support.

Behind the scenes, the Sussexes’ shock decision to step down and make a new life across the pond has affected Harry’s relationsh­ip with other cousins like Peter Phillips and Zara Tindall, to whom he is also close (although being just a year apart in age, Zara is friendlier with William).

Quite what the cousins make of the Sussexes’ statement appearing to take a swipe at their mother, the Princess Royal, remains to be seen. Following reports that Anne, one of the hardest-working members of the Royal family, was set to take over Harry’s role as Royal Marines Captain General, their markedly pointed missive hit back: “The Duke’s official military appointmen­ts will not be used as they are in the gift of the Sovereign. No new appointmen­ts will be made to fill these roles before the 12-month review of the new arrangemen­ts is completed.”

Summing up the mood, a source close to Zara last night told The Daily Telegraph: “The overwhelmi­ng feeling is just one of sadness. She is incredibly fond of Harry and just feels so sad about what has happened. That’s how they all feel.”

‘Tension between the Sussexes and the Yorks has simmered since Harry’s wedding’

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Family values: the once-strong bond between Beatrice, Eugenie and Harry has been tested in recent years
Family values: the once-strong bond between Beatrice, Eugenie and Harry has been tested in recent years

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom