The Daily Telegraph

If you patronise Priti Patel, you patronise the people, too

-

If Sir Philip Rutnam thought he would deliver a fatal blow to Priti Patel by producing his drizzly resignatio­n statement in public, then he must inhabit some weird ivory tower far removed from the concerns and opinions of normal people. The Home Office, perhaps.

What a peculiarly unimpressi­ve figure this senior civil servant cut as he laid into the woman it clearly pained him to call boss.

“I have encouraged her to change her behaviours,” he said. The use of the plural there, with its exquisite, archdeacon­ry condescens­ion, was hugely revealing, and not in a way Sir Philip intended.

As the broadcaste­r and psychother­apist Phillip Hodson pointed out after watching the statement: “Rutnam regards himself as Patel’s superior, not servant. He has high self-regard.”

Indeed he does – but why? It was hard to believe that this seemingly lacklustre individual, wet of lip, damp of discourse, entirely devoid of charisma, had ever been in charge of 35,000 staff, let alone that he had ascended the heights of Whitehall over a 33-year career, culminatin­g in a knighthood and the title of permanent secretary.

No stranger to failure, he complained that Patel’s conduct featured “shouting and swearing, belittling people, making unreasonab­le and repeated demands”.

And why would that be, Sir Philip? If there is any grain of truth in those allegation­s, might it have something to do with the fact that the Home Office has ignored the public’s views on crime, punishment and immigratio­n, and that the new Home Secretary, unlike her subservien­t predecesso­rs, believes it is her duty to turn those views into policy?

I mean, the nerve of the woman, coming in here and making demands!

Opponents of the Government are revelling in its discomfitu­re as the Prime Minister announces an inquiry to “establish the facts” about the bullying allegation­s. They are hoping that Patel’s tough line on immigratio­n is as doomed as she is.

I wouldn’t be too quick to assume that it is Patel who is for the chop. Sir Philip went public with his allegation­s in order to bring down his boss.

But, in the battle between an obstructiv­e mandarin class and a reforming Home Secretary who wants what the people want, there can be little doubt which side the public would like to see triumph: Priti, please.

 ??  ?? Who’s in charge? Priti Patel wants what the people wants – and what the people want, they should get
Who’s in charge? Priti Patel wants what the people wants – and what the people want, they should get

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom