The Daily Telegraph

Workers forced into furlough fraud blow the whistle on bosses

- By Charles Hymas HOME AFFAIRS EDITOR

EMPLOYEES are blowing the whistle on their companies after being forced to falsely claim they are furloughed so their bosses can make tens of thousands at the expense of taxpayers.

The two main whistleblo­wing organisati­ons in the UK say they have been “inundated” with calls from workers bullied into continuing to work while their firms claim 80 per cent of their salaries from HMRC.

Protect, the main UK whistleblo­wing charity, said 36 per cent of its coronaviru­s-related calls involved furlough fraud with the number rising each week – a trend partly spurred by HMRC’S decision to close its hotline after moving staff to work from home to stay safe during the pandemic.

Whistleblo­wers uk said the fraud appeared “rife” with its helpline receiving dozens of calls, including some from staff threatened with the sack if they did not continue working after being furloughed by their bosses.

Baroness Kramer, co-chairman of the all-party parliament­ary group for whistleblo­wing, said: “At a time like this when we as taxpayers are stepping forward to give people a lifeline, this abuse seems even more outrageous.”

Despite the closure of the hotline, HMRC said it had received 795 written or online complaints about furlough fraud up until May 14. The charities say this is an underestim­ate as many whistleblo­wers prefer to raise concerns on the phone rather than online.

They have identified three scams. One is where a firm furloughs staff but gets them to continue to work or volunteer unpaid. A second involves furloughin­g staff but not telling them and they only find out when they are paid. A third is where a firm claims furlough cash for a “ghost” employee who may be someone they dismissed or “recruited” so they could claim the money.

Alfred, a software developer for a medium-sized firm, told The Daily Telegraph he was summoned by his bosses and told he would be furloughed but that he should continue to work from home. If he refused, they told him he would be fired.

He discussed it with his wife and decided to call their bluff, saying he would not participat­e in a fraud and would take them to an employment tribunal if they fired him. He taped all his conversati­ons including one in which they named other employees who were party to the scam.

They backed down and he continues to work but is waiting anxiously for his pay to see if they have lied to him and whether he will need to make good his tribunal threat. “I have suffered insomnia, anxiety and stress but my family have stood by me,” he said.

Georgina Halford-hall, chief executive of Whistleblo­wers uk, said the fraud was forcing law-abiding people to break the law or face the sack: “You can see the absolute terror that good people are experienci­ng.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom