The big questions that still need to be answered
Cal Revely-calder and Ben Lawrence seek clarity on what the £1.57bn rescue package actually means
When can venues reopen?
This is the big question for live arts venues (galleries and cinemas are already slowly reopening). Until we get clear government guidance on social distancing and how venues can operate in restricted conditions, the bail-out has a nebulous purpose. There are now murmurings of West End theatres opening in October, but nothing is confirmed.
What will the money actually be used for?
Linked to the above, there is a suspicion that this money could merely be tiding over organisations while they remain closed. However, if live venues such as theatres and concert halls do open earlier, the cash injection could end up easing the burden of the loss caused by mounting productions for necessarily reduced audiences.
Is this bail-out a one-off?
Oliver Dowden, the Culture Secretary, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that live performances were some way off, and that the bail-out will bridge the gap. But arts organisations will need to know when their audiences will be allowed to return, and whether the aid will be renewed if not. Were a second bail-out refused, the first would have been a waste. Conversely, would the prospect of repeated renewals discourage some useful thrift?
Will there be guidelines for how the money is spent?
It isn’t clear whether the bail-out comes with strings attached – and who pulls them if it is. The ideological leanings of the Government and the arts world are not always (to put it mildly) the same. Guidelines or no, the process will be scrutinised closely, to ensure that taxpayers’ money is being used in a sensible style.
When will the money be available? Time is of the essence. The Nuffield Theatres in Southampton have already closed; the Royal Exchange has shed staff; the National is doing the same. While the bail-out is welcome, venues and organisations everywhere will be looking at their dwindling reserves – bills can’t all be deferred.
Who will get grants and who will get loans?
So far, we have been told that the £1.15billion support pot for cultural organisations in England will be made up of £270million in repayable finance and £880million in grants. What we don’t know is who is eligible for what. Presumably, those in an impecunious state will be awarded grants, while those with healthier reserves will get loans.
Will the money be distributed through the regions?
Dowden has stated that while protecting the crown jewels (that is, the big London powerhouses with international clout), the money will also be spread throughout the whole of the UK. The new funding also means an extra £188million for arts organisations within the devolved administrations of Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
What will be the split between the commercial and subsidised sector? The scramble for money is going to be hard fought, and one assumes that everything will be assessed on a case-by-case basis. That means subsidised organisations that will come under the jurisdiction of Arts Council England should be on an equal footing with those commercial operations that never receive state subsidy.
Who will be in the room when the decisions are made?
The bail-out is designed for “UK culture” in toto, but not everyone thinks the bureaucrats are fair. To name one of many instances: Arts Council England gives 62 per cent of its main music fund to opera, and just 15 per cent to rock, pop, jazz, folk and other “popular” styles. Since ACE will advise on funding decisions, music promoters will be watching like hawks.
Will freelancers receive any help? These are the unsung heroes of the arts, from bottom to top – even opera singers are largely paid by the performance, not contracted full time. Speaking yesterday, however, the Culture Secretary suggested that the furlough scheme would protect freelancers – but this scheme is due to end in October. What are these performers supposed to do then? This package is clearly designed for organisations not individuals.