The Daily Telegraph

We need to improve our breast cancer screening

Her sisters’ experience­s in the UK and Canada showed Rebecca Ley that we still have a way to go in diagnosing the disease

-

When the singer Sarah Harding of Girls Aloud revealed last week on social media that she had advanced breast cancer, aged just 38, the revelation led to an outpouring of shock and concern that someone so young could be affected.

Yet this horrible, insidious disease, the most common cancer for women worldwide, touches most of our lives at some point, directly or indirectly. It has mine.

Both of my older maternal halfsister­s have suffered from it. Charlotte, a mother of three from Cornwall, was just 37 when she was diagnosed in 2009. Then in 2014, just as our family was recovering from the shock, my other older sister Anne, a mother of one who lives in Toronto, Canada, was also diagnosed. She was 45 and her early-stage cancer was only picked up by extra screening, because of Charlotte’s illness.

Thankfully, they are both now doing well, but the experience was frightenin­g. The kind of MRI screening that picked up Anne’s cancer is not widely available on the NHS. Indeed, the UK has a less robust screening programme than many other developed nations, which may explain why we are in the top 10 of countries for breast cancer risk.

Harding’s diagnosis has reignited calls for the screening age in the UK to be lowered. Currently, you will be offered regular mammograms from the age of 50 – lowered to 40 if you have a family history.

But a recent study suggested that screening women from 40 has the potential to save lives. A group at Queen Mary University of London looked at data on

160,000 women between the ages of 39 and 41 who were either randomly assigned to annual breast screening or had to wait until they were eligible for the usual NHS screening. They found that additional screening saved lives, especially in the first 10 years.

But the Covid-19 pandemic has halted another major UK breast screening trial set up to determine whether extending the screening age bracket to include women aged 47-49 and 71-73 would reduce mortality.

Prof Kefah Mokbel, chairman of the multidisci­plinary breast cancer programme at The London Breast Institute, explains: “Breast cancer mortality in the UK is higher than many western European countries due to less frequent mammograph­y screening, which also starts at a later age.” He adds: “In general the breast cancer risk is higher in Western developed countries compared with developing nations. This difference is thought to be mainly due to lifestyle, with higher consumptio­n of processed food, animal fat and alcohol. In Europe itself, the risk is lower in the south, attributed to the Mediterran­ean diet and higher vitamin D levels.”

Prof Mokbel also points to our GP system as problemati­c. He says: “GPS act as the gatekeeper and first point of contact for all patients with breast symptoms. In our experience, the GP tends to refer all patients with symptoms to specialist centres. Unfortunat­ely, this leads to unnecessar­y delay in the specialist assessment. In my opinion, the ideal solution would be for patients to contact designated breast care centres where a telephone triage can be performed immediatel­y so that patients with symptoms suspicious for cancer can be seen promptly.”

So how can any of us in Britain – especially those with a family history – protect ourselves? First up is understand­ing your genetic risk profile. Both of my sisters had genetic testing but neither carries the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes most commonly associated with breast and ovarian cancer.

However, there are many others associated with breast cancer. If you have a family history you should speak to your GP, says Dr Anne Bruinvels, a biomedical scientist and founder of Owise, an app to help breast cancer sufferers navigate data. “If you have two or more first-degree relatives they should refer you to a clinical genetic specialist for testing.”

Those who can’t access genetic testing on the NHS, perhaps because they have only one relative, might opt to pay for screening privately.

Once you are as clear-eyed as possible about your genetic risk, the next thing to stay on top of is screening. Some experts argue that mammograms are not necessaril­y the most precise diagnostic tool for premenopau­sal women. In Toronto, my sister Anne was offered regular MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) screening as well as mammograms because of her family history. Her mammogram result was clear but just a week later, an MRI showed something awry. She then had an ultrasound and the lumpectomy that diagnosed her cancer – too small to show up on a mammogram.

As Dr Bruinvels says: “The UK is still very married to the mammogram model. Mammograms are better as a diagnostic tool for people who don’t have dense breast tissue. Premenopau­sal breasts are often denser. MRIS are quite expensive, but they are better at picking up small breast cancers in that kind of tissue.”

If you are high risk you may be offered MRIS in addition to mammograph­y in the UK, but if you are only at moderate risk that usually isn’t the case. Prof Mokbel adds: “Women who have dense breasts should have supplement­al ultrasound scanning to improve screening accuracy.”

Dr Bruinvels adds: “What’s incredibly important is staying breast aware. Early detection saves lives, so you need to get used to how your breasts look and feel, seeking medical advice if you notice any changes.”

‘MRIS are better than mammograms in picking up cancers in dense breast tissue’

Many breast cancers are related to reproducti­ve hormones, so whether or not to take HRT for menopausal symptoms is another considerat­ion for women with a family history. Prof Mokbel says: “I advise women to avoid it if they can. If they really need it they should ideally take it through the skin in the form of a cream or a patch.”

In terms of lifestyle factors, exercise is important. Prof Mokbel says: “Three cancer types are shown to be associated with inactivity – breast, bowel for men and women and uterine. Breast cancer has the largest number of cases associated with inactivity of all three.

“The exact mechanism for reducing risk is not known. It could simply be down to healthy weight maintenanc­e. Or it could be that exercise can reduce oestrogen levels or increase cell response to insulin absorption, both of which could affect breast cancer growth.” Diet is also a considerat­ion.

Prof Mokbel says: “There is some evidence that animal fat, particular­ly overcooked red meat, increases your risk because it contains chemical compounds called nitrosamin­es which are carcinogen­ic. So eating red meat only once or twice a week – and not overcookin­g it – is sensible.”

Other than that, the only food proven to help is a Mediterran­ean diet rich in fresh fruit, vegetables, olive oil, nuts and fish. He dismisses the widely held notion that dairy products are dangerous as a “misconcept­ion”.

“I would encourage women to eat low-fat yogurt as it’s rich in calcium, very important for preventing osteoporos­is, and contains vitamin D3 and useful bacteria.” You might also consider supplement­ing with vitamin D, he adds.

Alcohol, even in small amounts, raises risk. “We recommend a maximum of one unit a day. The less you drink the better and no drinking at all is better still,” said Prof Mokbel.

Finally, you might also want to consider ditching your aluminium-based antiperspi­rant. Consultant breast surgeon Nicolas Beechey-newman says: “There is a profusion of synthetic chemicals in our modern environmen­t with a synthetic oestrogeni­c effect – meaning they mimic the hormone. One of these is aluminium. It’s hard to prove a correlatio­n but concerns can’t be completely dismissed and it could be worth seeking an alternativ­e.”

My sisters’ experience was part of the inspiratio­n behind my novel For When I’m Gone. It explores the impact that breast cancer can have on a family and the unthinkabl­e idea of having to say goodbye to your loved ones far too early.

For as Harding’s diagnosis shows, breast cancer doesn’t discrimina­te. Breast awareness saves lives and we should all stay vigilant.

For When I’m Gone by Rebecca Ley is published by Orion Fiction in hardback, ebook and audio, on Thursday

 ??  ?? Screening: in the UK, women are offered a routine test at 50. Sarah Harding, below, was diagnosed at 38. Bottom left, Rebecca Ley
Screening: in the UK, women are offered a routine test at 50. Sarah Harding, below, was diagnosed at 38. Bottom left, Rebecca Ley
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom