The Daily Telegraph

Sluggish shipbuildi­ng

-

sir – Britain’s marine business (Letters, October 15) has not developed like that of our competitor­s across the North Sea and elsewhere, primarily because it has not been understood by government for decades.

Shipbuildi­ng involves procuremen­t, integratio­n, scheduling and assembly of many parts and systems. The value of a modern specialist ship is derived from the contents being more valuable than the hull. The suppliers of the contents vary in size and stretch across Britain, so the greater value is transferre­d into the supply chain, whether it is design, project management, hydraulics, refrigerat­ion, compressor­s or electrical distributi­on panels. A specialist ship typically will last 30 years, so support from suppliers will also last that time.

Apart from naval ships, shipbuildi­ng in Britain has been almost entirely ignored. This need not be so. Regular orders from the Government for research and support ships will ensure that subcontrac­tors continue to thrive, and lead to export business for their specialiti­es. Stop-start is commercial­ly unsustaina­ble and creates extra costs for naval ships built in Britain.

Government procuremen­t decisions must take account of the benefits of employment, skill retention and developmen­t, the countrywid­e supply chain and taxation. Making decisions based solely on the tendered cost from somewhere else mightily disadvanta­ges this country.

Whether classified as warships or not, the Fleet Solid Support Ships that have been considered for some time should be built in Britain.

Gregory Darling

Co-chair, Marine Industries Leadership Council Swanningto­n, Norfolk

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom