The Daily Telegraph

Sadiq Khan has been a disaster for London

His push for a crushing new lockdown in the capital is just the latest example of his recklessne­ss

- iain duncan smith Sir Iain Duncan Smith is a former leader of the Conservati­ve Party read more at telegraph.co.uk/opinion

London is one of the great cities of the world. It is a leader in entertainm­ent and the arts, has some of the best restaurant­s and nightlife on the planet and is, of course, both the global centre for financial services and the home of parliament­ary democracy.

You would assume that such a great city would be led by a great public figure, of stature and of note. Someone who demonstrat­ed by their leadership how a complex and diverse city could thrive. In short, the sort of power figure who would even, in certain circumstan­ces, be treated as an equal by world leaders.

Yet here in London we have Sadiq Khan, a man whose irrelevanc­e is only matched by his incompeten­ce when called upon to make decisions.

His latest betrayal of our nation’s capital has come with his demand that London be placed into tier two restrictio­ns at a time when most of his fellow mayors were desperatel­y begging the UK Government not to raise restrictio­ns. He is either oblivious to or simply does not care about the devastatin­g effect these policies will have on London, the powerhouse of the UK economy. There are a huge range of sectors, from sandwich shops to banks, that will be affected – to varying degrees – by tighter Covid rules. The West End alone accounts for around 4 per cent of UK GDP and it is utterly flat.

Khan’s answer to this devastatio­n has been, as usual when he has made a mess of something, to blame the Government, a tactic he combines neatly with his endless appeals for more money.

Ever since Covid first hit, the Mayor’s approach has been a bundle of contradict­ions. First he said transport was safe. Then he decreed that it wasn’t. At one stage key workers were crammed onto busy Tube trains because Khan, in his wisdom, had said that the number of trains running should be slashed. Then there was the mess over whether he was going to give drivers PPE, despite 14 transport workers dying of coronaviru­s.

But a simple glance at his abysmal record since he came to office shows that Khan was never likely to rise to the challenge of coronaviru­s.

He came to power on a swathe of promises which have since gone unfulfille­d. He pledged to build 264,000 new homes, yet he has built only 52,000. Despite the fact he was handed £4.8 billion by the Government to build 166,000 affordable homes, he has built less than half of what he promised. He also said he would reduce crime, only for London to witness an epidemic in gang violence, resulting in the senseless deaths of young people and the growth of a culture of criminalit­y.

Just before the lockdown, homicides were the highest in 11 years, robbery was up 73 per cent and knife crime and burglary were up 38 per cent. When confronted by violence on the streets, with police chiefs crying out for more funding, he chose to raise the culture budget by £11.4 million – the equivalent of hiring an extra 162 police officers. I wonder if police chiefs felt better because, instead of extra police, his spending included £760,000 on beach parties.

His running of Transport for London’s budget has also been utterly appalling. He has already received bailouts of £3.6 billion for Crossrail and a further £1.6 billion in May. Earlier this month he was back demanding more – a further £5.6 billion to keep the transport network going for the next 18 months. All of that is money from taxpayers from across the UK, many of whom can only dream of having the sort of public transport options available to Londoners.

Of course, there have been reduced revenues due to the pandemic, but that is no excuse for the dreadful decisions, such as his misleading, unsustaina­ble fares freeze pledge taken beforehand. Presumably, his plan was to have fought and won his second term before the full horror of what he had done to the TFL balance sheet became clear.

There is a great deal of irony in this having been exposed because the election was delayed.

All this would be bad enough if the Mayor were merely incompeten­t, but the pattern of his tenure shows that he has some truly warped priorities. Like some Tudor monarch, he has surrounded himself with the trappings of power. His private office staffing budget has risen by a staggering 60 per cent and City Hall office spending by £527 million. While everything has been falling apart at home, he has spent £8,355 on overseas visits.

His PR budget alone has risen by £200,000 and he has become notorious for his contrived photo ops. As his reputation as a man who can’t run anything has grown, his answer has been to try and take credit for almost anything that works in London, even if he had nothing to do with any of it. You have heard of “pop-up restaurant­s”. Well, Khan has mastered the pop-up mayoralty. No wonder he needs to spend so much on spin doctors.

At a time when London needed real leadership it has had someone in charge whose whole purpose is self-promotion. A weak mayor at a good time is a problem. At a terrible time like this, when London needs its case to be heard, it is a disaster.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom