The Daily Telegraph

Lords overwhelmi­ngly reject ‘Trump-like’ Brexit bill

- By Amy Jones POLITICAL CORRESPOND­ENT

THE House of Lords voted resounding­ly to remove controvers­ial clauses from Boris Johnson’s Brexit legislatio­n last night, as peers accused the Government of behaving like a “third world dictatorsh­ip”.

In a major defeat for the Prime Minister, peers sought to expunge sections of the Internal Market Bill which ministers admitted would break internatio­nal law in a “very specific and limited way”.

Peers voted by 433 to 165 to strip out the clauses which would allow the UK to renege on its obligation­s in the Withdrawal Agreement.

During the debate, Tory grandee Lord Clarke warned that the legislatio­n was a “rather Donald Trump-like gesture” and urged peers to join him in voting against the Government.

“I’ve never heard anybody describe any particular proposal that is being forced upon us in these negotiatio­ns by Brussels which should have such a horrendous and catastroph­ic consequenc­e that we need to be allowed to behave like the government of a third world dictatorsh­ip,” he said. The former chancellor said that no government he served in would have “contemplat­ed for one moment” proposing the powers set out in the Bill. “It would have been rejected as incompatib­le with the way we govern this country, so it is the duty of this House to reject it,” he said.

Lord Howard, the former Conservati­ve leader, said the UK would set a “lamentable example” if it were to break internatio­nal law. He said he was “dismayed” that the Government would choose to “break its word, to break internatio­nal law and to renege on a treaty” as its first act of independen­ce. He added: “I voted for Brexit and I do not regret or resign from that vote. But I want the independen­t, sovereign state that I voted for to be a country which keeps its word, that upholds the rule of law and honours its treaty obligation­s.”

Meanwhile, Justin Welby, the Archbishop of Canterbury, warned that it could have “unintended and serious consequenc­es for peace and reconcilia­tion” in Northern Ireland. He said that process “did not end with the Belfast Agreement”. “It remains an ongoing process, which requires awareness from leaders that almost every decision taken in relation to Northern Ireland will have an impact,” he added.

Opponents claim the legislatio­n risks violating the terms of the Good Friday Agreement, leading to fears it will put the Prime Minister on course to clash with Joe Biden, the US president-elect. During his campaign, Mr Biden warned that a trade deal with the US was “contingent” on the prevention of a return to a hard border on the island of Ireland.

The Government confirmed last night that it would retable the clauses peers voted against.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom