The Daily Telegraph

I never lost custody of my children, says Duchess’s half-sister

- By Victoria Ward

THE Duchess of Sussex’s half-sister yesterday accused her of falsely briefing she had lost custody of her three children.

Samantha Markle, from whom the Duchess has been estranged for several years, hit back at the “PR smears” and attacked the “grandiose” image she had created of herself.

It emerged on Wednesday that the Duchess had authorised a senior aide to speak to the authors of a biography about her family.

She apologised to the Court of Appeal after a series of emails were disclosed which appeared to contradict her previous claim that she had not collaborat­ed with Omid Scobie and Carolyn Durand, co-authors of Finding Freedom.

Amid the notes she sent to Jason Knauf, her former communicat­ions secretary, were several details about Miss Markle and her half-brother Thomas Markle Jr, as the Duchess sought to distance herself from her biological family.

She urged Mr Knauf to disclose that her siblings had “dropped out of high school” and that she had “never had a relationsh­ip with either of them”, or even known their birthdays or middle names.

Of Samantha, she said: “She had lost custody of all three of her three children from different fathers.”

Miss Markle said the use of Finding Freedom to “take pot shots” was “hurtful and revealing”. She told The Daily Telegraph: “To see Jason Knauf ’s evidence was shocking. I never lost custody of my kids ... no court record on the planet would confirm that.

“To take personal matters and then spin them in an ugly way to discredit me is pretty tacky.

“Everyone, even Trevor (Engelson, Meghan’s first husband), who has been good to her – she has a disgusting way of disposing, stepping on and then silencing. The public will form an appropriat­e opinion of her based on her own actions. People do not like to be lied to and manipulate­d.

“She’s going to have to live with that. She’s so grandiose, she self-sabotaged.”

Miss Markle claimed that the Duchess had constructe­d an image of herself in order to fit in with the Royal family and that she had distanced herself from her father and siblings in order to maintain the facade. She said that she and her father, Thomas Markle, who has also been shut out by the Duchess, had wanted to give Meghan “the benefit of the doubt” but were now having to come to terms with the fact that she had actively briefed against them.

In an interview with GB News yesterday, Mr Markle claimed his daughter wanted him to cease contact with his children. He said: “That’s sort of what pushed us all apart. Meghan wanted me to stop talking to both my older children, and I can’t do that. They’re my children, I love all my children.”

The Duchess has blamed the rift with her father on his dealings with the media. In her emails to Mr Knauf, the Duchess said she had supported her father, “in spite of his reclusiven­ess” but that media pressure had “crumbled him”.

She added: “Despite countless efforts to support him through the past two years, they now no longer have a relationsh­ip.”

Miss Markle, who has written a book about her frosty relationsh­ip with her sister called The Diary of Princess Pushy’s Sister Part I, said a part of her could not believe that the Duchess had been “the driving force” behind the biography all along.

“To see her nonchalant­ly say that she wants to see this added and that added, like items on a lunch menu was astonishin­g,” she said. “She’s got an appetite for her own sense of empowermen­t by doing damage to others.”

 ?? ?? Samantha Markle said the Duchess using her biography to take ‘pot shots’ at her was ‘hurtful’, adding that Meghan had created a ‘grandiose’ image of herself
Samantha Markle said the Duchess using her biography to take ‘pot shots’ at her was ‘hurtful’, adding that Meghan had created a ‘grandiose’ image of herself

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom