The Daily Telegraph

A bridge too far for invaders as almost a whole unit wiped out

Attempt to cross river Donets ends in reported loss of 1,000 troops after Ukrainians’ counter-attack

- By Robert Mendick

MILITARY experts agree that crossing any river in the middle of a conflict is not easy. But the Russian army’s attempt to build a pontoon over the Siverskyi Donets river was so catastroph­ically flawed that it ended with a large portion of a battalion wiped out in the process.

If ever a battle in the brutal Ukraine war was emblematic of Russian military failure then perhaps this was it – the disastrous bid to build a bridge over the river Donets.

Drone footage shows the aftermath of the bloody confrontat­ion. Russian army vehicles, including as many as three dozen tanks and tracked vehicles, were blown to smithereen­s as the battalion gathered to make the crossing.

Reports, albeit unverified, suggest the river, its banks and the surroundin­g forests are now the graveyard for up to 1,000 Russian troops.

If correct, the failed crossing of the Donets would represent the single biggest loss of life suffered by Vladimir Putin’s forces since the war began 78 days ago.

On social media, a Ukrainian soldier, using the name Maxim, explained how the Ukrainian army had stumbled across the Russian advance and thwarted it with devastatin­g effect.

Ukrainian forces had waited until the pontoon bridge was almost complete and Russian vehicles moving along it when artillery targeted the area, said Maxim, an engineer sent out on reconnaiss­ance who had identified the location where Russia had planned to cross.

In a counter-attack, a Ukrainian river boat squad, possibly a special forces team, had identified when the Russians began building the pontoon.

Visibility was virtually nil, because Russian troops had thrown smoke grenades and set nearby trees on fire.

Ukrainians had waited until they heard the chugging of Russian tugs building the bridge, monitored its progress and then called in artillery and drone strikes.

The footage, taken by drone, shows the carnage in the wake of the Ukrainian assault: at least two and possibly three temporary bridges sunk, and the remains of Russian military vehicles scattered on both sides of the river bank and in the woods beyond.

Russian troops had succeeded in crossing the river and had then been left stranded and open to massacre.

Ben Barry, a retired brigadier and former director of British Army staff at the Ministry of Defence, said: “No one pretends river crossings are easy but the higher the standard of military leadership, command and tactical training the more likely it is to be achieved.”

Mr Barry, the senior fellow for land warfare at the Internatio­nal Institute for Strategic Studies, had seen the photograph­s of the battlefiel­d, adding: “These reports are consistent with other evidence of Russian military performanc­e from fighting in Kyiv and Kharkiv. Doing a river crossing is one of the most difficult things to do in warfare.” In other words, a well-trained army would struggle to cross the Siverskyi Donets river and the Kremlin’s forces are not in that category.

The Siverskyi Donets (Donets for short) flows for 650 miles through the Donbas, the region in eastern Ukraine to which fighting has switched after Vladimir Putin gave up on his plan for a swift victory by taking Kyiv and unseating Volodymyr Zelensky, the president.

The Donets starts in Russia, and winds its way south east through Ukraine before re-entering Russian territory, and flowing into the Don that empties into the Sea of Azov at Rostovon-don.

The Kremlin forces had hoped to cross the Donets near Bilohorivk­a, an impoverish­ed town in the Luhansk region. A Russian battalion, it is thought, had tried to cross in order to surround Lysychansk, an industrial hub in the Donbas ten miles away.

Maxim, in his post on Twitter, claims to have identified the location of the planned crossing on May 7 and reported it back to his unit. A day later, the sound of Russian tugboats manoeuvrin­g into position was detected, signalling the start of the assault.

There will inevitably be speculatio­n that Ukraine had help from the West.

The Washington Post reported yesterday that “informatio­n about the location and movements of Russian forces is flowing to Ukraine in real-time” and that that informatio­n “includes satellite imagery and reporting gleaned from sensitive US sources”, likely to mean hitech espionage surveillan­ce on Russian command posts.

“The intelligen­ce is very good. It tells us where the Russians are so that we can hit them,” one Ukrainian official told the newspaper.

The official then made a hand signal to imitate a bomb falling on its target.

Russia’s progress in the Donbas has, like its previous assault on Kyiv, stalled badly. Its inability to cross rivers will play its own part.

On Twitter, Maxim boasted that he “outplayed” Russia’s military engineers because its engineers had “attempted to place a bridge RIGHT in the place where I guessed.”

Russian forces had succeeded in putting in place the pontoon and troops and vehicles had begun moving across it. At that point, said Maxim, “the combat started.”

Twenty minutes after the reconnaiss­ance team had confirmed the Russian bridge’s existence, heavy artillery began shelling its location.

The Ukrainian army’s 17th tank brigade, operating T-64 tanks and BMP armoured vehicles, opened fire deploying its 2S1 122-millimetre tracked howitzers, according to reports.

The shelling destroyed T-72 and T-80 Russian tanks, and two dozen armoured tracked vehicles as well as bridging equipment and a tugboat.

“I was still in the area and I have never seen/ heard such heavy combat in my life,” said Maxim.

‘These reports tally with other evidence of Russian military performanc­e in Kyiv and Kharkiv’

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom