The Daily Telegraph

Britain is fed up, bitter and practicall­y broke – and it’s all going to get worse

Like much of the West, the UK is facing a baby bust that is set to unleash a tsunami of economic pain

- ALLISTER HEATH FOLLOW Allister Heath on Twitter @Allisterhe­ath; READ MORE at telegraph.co.uk/opinion

Welcome to gerontocra­tic Britain. Sir Paul Mccartney, 80, was the star attraction at the once youthful but now desperatel­y middle-aged Glastonbur­y. Sir Elton John, 75, filled Hyde Park last weekend. The state pension is shooting up, financed by a tax raid on the young. The latest Census revealed that we are plunging into a catastroph­ic baby bust.

The young and not so young are demoralise­d, downcast and have gone on baby strike, and not merely because they paid the price for protecting their elders from Covid. As the number of 90-year olds reaches an all-time high, there are 264,650 fewer under-fours than a decade ago, a 7.6 per cent slump. How many schools will need to shut, replaced by care homes and retirement villages? The signs are unmissable: Britain is a society that is losing trust in the future, and is increasing­ly terrified of its present.

The greying of everything, the dissipatio­n of a defined youth culture, means that we are now peering into a precipice of demographi­c, economic, social and cultural decline. There will be fewer successful start-ups, less innovation, less reform and no more Cool Britannia. Worst of all, we are facing a fiscal calamity, massively higher taxes and permanent economic stasis. Yes, of course, the gap can continue to be plugged by immigratio­n, but will the public accept this indefinite­ly?

There are upsides to an ageing population. Older people are wiser: they have lived through political and economic cycles and are better able to place events in a longer-term context. They are less likely to be fooled into buying into a shiny new ideology or to fall foul of some political confidence trickster. There is a great value to experience that uber-youthful societies, in their revolution­ary zeal and impatience, tend to overlook.

The old, whose income is contingent on a benign political and economic environmen­t, are a powerful enforcer of political stability. They will continue to defeat Corbynites and oppose the kinds of wealth taxes that would cripple the economy. Their desire for higher interest rates will solve many of the problems of the past 15-20 years: tighter money will tackle inflation, lower house prices, puncture bubbles and purge the economy of zombie firms.

Yet the ageing of our population is now happening for the wrong reasons. The problem is obviously not that there are too many older people: it is that there are too few children. There are now more over-65s (11.1 million) than under-15s (10.4 million), a dramatic reversal on 10 years ago.

A society with fewer children is inevitably more risk-averse. This is partly biological: elevated testostero­ne, progestero­ne and oestrogen levels in teenagers results in volatile emotional responses. In extremis, this can lead to war and violence; it also means that younger people are willing to take risks, to create new businesses, to innovate, to think the unthinkabl­e. They have little to lose and are desperate to win.

Silicon Valley was created by the young, not by the middle aged.

As Paul Morland points out in Tomorrow’s People, the relative size of younger and older cohorts determines not just a country’s demographi­c centre of gravity but also its culture. An ageing population constrains the young directly and indirectly. Nightclubs have been shutting for years, well before Covid, and at a much faster rate than the decline in the proportion of younger people. When the old dominate a society, or reach a certain critical mass, the young themselves begin to act as if they, too, were older. They watch Netflix rather than go out.

The era of radical youth culture, Morland argues, was born with the baby boomers, a huge, incredibly influentia­l cohort of teenagers and young adults, and has faded away with their ageing. For better or for worse, an obsession with Youtubers and Tiktok is incomparab­le in significan­ce to the rock and roll and sexual revolution­s of the 1960s.

All of this is terrible news for the welfare state, invented when societies were youthful. In 1889, when Bismarck introduced his state pension, he set the retirement age at 70, even though life expectancy in Germany was around 39 at the time, according to Statista, an extraordin­ary con. Only the very fortunate would ever see a payout; today, the benefit is almost universal, triggering huge costs.

The ageing population has also made the NHS untenable: it is madness to think that the state, unaided by private insurance, can meet the exploding costs of the oldest population in history. It is crazier to believe government­s can guarantee nobody will need to sell their homes to pay for care. We are also going to have to spend a lot more on defence. What will give? Will Vat hit 25 per cent, or National Insurance rise and rise again? The economy would collapse.

There is no simple explanatio­n for the global baby bust. Population­s are ageing rapidly almost everywhere, whether countries are developed or still emerging, and the number of children as a proportion of the population is falling almost universall­y, usually to well below replacemen­t levels. This applies to countries with generous maternity and paternity laws as well as those without, to those that subsidise childcare and those that do not.

Britain’s extortiona­te house prices are so extreme that they are undoubtedl­y a factor, but the birth rate isn’t noticeably higher in parts of the country that are more affordable, or even in countries where housing is cheaper. There appear to be much greater forces at play, including increasing education, secularisa­tion and urbanisati­on, as well as frustratio­n: polls demonstrat­e that women often want more children than they are having.

But what is clear is that the situation in Britain is being exacerbate­d by younger people believing that society is rigged against them. Lockdowns were a calamity. Wages are depressed, higher education too expensive, housing obviously disastrous and it feels to many as if the old are too powerful, that their privileges – triple-locked pensions, free bus passes and the rest – are being extracted from young workers.

It is no wonder that they are depressed, turning to the far-left, embracing a demented woke ideology that pits groups and genders against one another, and even the kind of extreme green death-cultery which advocates zero children. The young need to be cut a fairer deal, or else Britain will be overwhelme­d by a demographi­c and fiscal tsunami.

The situation is being exacerbate­d by younger people believing that society is rigged against them

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom