The Daily Telegraph

It’s the height of entitlemen­t to think you’re owed an inheritanc­e

- Judith Woods

Have you heard the one about the grandfathe­r who was so hurt that some of his grandchild­ren didn’t visit him more often that he gave them just £50 each from his £500,000 fortune when he died? It’s not a joke – unless you count cosmic jokes in which the laughter echoes, long and loud from the afterlife. It happened, here in Britain.

Something to lament? No! Something to laminate! Buy a paper, cut out and keep the story. Print off a copy. Heck, print off dozens. Pin them to noticeboar­ds in every care home and GP surgery.

Post details on the family Whatsapp as a salutary warning to the chippy millennial­s and slacker Gen-zers who have the temerity to slag off “boomers” for having it easy. It’s high time they grasped that nothing comes for free – not even that inheritanc­e they’ve been banking on for a house deposit. Money must be earnt, and when it comes to ageing relatives, this is one gig where working from home won’t cut it.

Admittedly the five grandchild­ren in question of Frederick Ward are now all middle-aged women, but it’s never too early to learn one of life’s hardest lessons; just because you feel entitled doesn’t mean you are entitled – just ask High Court judge, Master James Brightwell. It was he who presided over this fabulous tale-with-a-twist worthy of Roald Dahl or the cautionary poems of Hilaire Belloc; the grandpa who clearly felt left alone in life and left nothing in death.

Well, not quite nothing. Former soldier Mr Ward gave a nicely derisory sum of £50 each to the five granddaugh­ters after he was upset they did not go to see him often enough. A splendid touch, conveying as it does that granddad didn’t forget to include them. Quite the reverse; he thought about them – he just didn’t think much of them.

As is the way of the modern world, uproar ensued. I should have thought shame and selfflagel­lation would be a more appropriat­e response than truculent litigiousn­ess, but each to their own.

It’s just a pity Mr Ward wasn’t around to enjoy the sight of his relatives scrapping in court. His is the ultimate act of post-mortem point-scoring – and a long overdue corrective to the soft-focus stereotype­s peddled by Werther’s (un) Originals, in which kindly grandparen­ts are reduced to ciphers; mere bit-players in their grandchild­ren’s lives.

Incidental­ly, Mr Ward left the bulk of his fortune to his son and daughter. His third child, a son, who was father to the five granddaugh­ters, predecease­d him and thereafter relations seem to have cooled. As a result the court ruled he was perfectly at liberty to play favourites and leave out family members with whom he had a lesser relationsh­ip.

Quite right, too. In truth, we all very much hope we won’t have to plead, cajole, bully or bribe our nearest and, theoretica­lly at least, dearest to drop by in our twilight years. But honestly, if they really are too self-absorbed, why not have a little fun at their expense?

If the pocket philosophe­rs of Pinterest are to be believed, love is the most precious gift one generation can pass on to the next. Try telling that to Generation Rent fretting about their financial future; if love doesn’t do it for them, keep mentioning the money.

So a word to the wise; the meek shall inherit the earth, but only if they swing by for a visit more than occasional­ly. Revenge is famously a dish best served cold; and there ain’t nothing colder than ladling it out from the grave.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom