The Daily Telegraph

Kremlin ‘responsibl­e for’ Havana Syndrome

- By David Millward us correspond­ent

A SECRETIVE Russian intelligen­ce unit may have been responsibl­e for Havana Syndrome, the debilitati­ng sickness which has struck US diplomats, spies, contractor­s and their families, an investigat­ion has found.

Research by The Insider, an independen­t Russian investigat­ive website, the German news magazine Der Spiegel and the CBS series 60 Minutes has pinned the blame on Unit 29155. Members of the unit are alleged to have used sonic weapons, using radio frequencie­s, to target their victims’ brains.

Dubbed “Havana Syndrome” after staff at the US embassy in Cuba started complainin­g of the sickness in 2016, victims have suffered mysterious health issues including hearing loss, insomnia, memory loss, poor balance and inability to concentrat­e. Victims complained of ear pain and pressure in their heads.

Christo Grozev, an investigat­ive journalist, identified the alleged assailant as Albert Averyanov, who, according to intelligen­ce sources, is the son of Unit 29155’s founder.

Mark Lenzl, a victim of Havana Syndrome and a State Department official, has little doubt the Russians were responsibl­e for the attack. He added: “US government personnel behind closed doors have acknowledg­ed to me that my and my family’s diagnosed traumatic brain injuries are due to exposure to high levels of pulsed microwave radiation.”

Mark Zaid, a lawyer representi­ng many of the victims, accused the US government of concealing the truth.

“It has been so distressin­g to see how much effort our government has undertaken to cover up the true details of these attacks, no doubt perpetrate­d by a foreign adversary,” Mr Zaid said.

Greg Edgreen, who ran a Pentagon investigat­ion into the attacks, had little doubt Russia was responsibl­e, and said “consistent­ly there was a Russia nexus. There was some angle where they had worked against Russia, focused on Russia, and done extremely well”.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligen­ce disputed his conclusion. In a statement, it said the incidents “were the result of factors that did not involve a foreign adversary.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom