The Daily Telegraph

EU official spared harassment fine as pension too small to dock

- By Joe Barnes

A EUROPEAN UNION official sexually harassed a colleague but was let off as his Brussels pension was too small to dock without making him go hungry.

The disciplina­ry case was one of dozens opened for a string of offences committed by badly behaved Eurocrats last year, according to an internal report obtained by The Telegraph.

They include officials who forged payslips and medical records, failed to adhere to coronaviru­s rules and abused colleagues. The Investigat­ory and Disciplina­ry Office of the Commission (IDOC) investigat­ed 101 new cases last year, resulting in two dismissals.

A quarter of probes (25) launched by EU investigat­ors related to sexual or psychologi­cal harassment claims.

In one case, a now retired official was found to have “sexually harassed a colleague by creating an intimidati­ng and disturbing environmen­t during a conversati­on”. The unnamed man was let off because docking his pension would take it below the bloc’s minimum subsistenc­e levels. According to EU rules, the minimum pension cannot be less than 40 per cent of the basic salary for the lowest level of official – €3,327 (£2,850) for someone with at least 10 years of service.

In a similar example, a team leader was only warned after he had shown a “hegemonic attitude in the coordinati­on of teamwork, which put his colleagues in a lasting state of unease”.

The IDOC report added: “He also verbally abused a female colleague, belittled her during meetings and contradict­ed and criticised her in public in an inappropri­ate manner by using an aggressive and rude tone.”

Another investigat­ion into a temporary contractin­g agent found the man had used European Commission (EC) databases to obtain private contact details of colleagues and sent them “repeated, insisting and sometimes offending and threatenin­g messages”.

Despite the highest paid EU civil servants earning almost €19,000 a month, there were still numerous officials found guilty of fraud.

In one case, an unnamed official was found guilty of forging seven payslips that were submitted to a national court in a divorce hearing “in order to reduce the monthly contributi­on he should pay to his ex-spouse for their child”.

Despite the report stating he caused “reputation­al damage” to the commission, he escaped punishment because of “extenuatin­g circumstan­ces” and his “excellent working performanc­e”.

Another official was found to have lied about his marital status for more than 10 years to claim household allowances that he was no longer entitled to. The unnamed official was demoted by one pay grade for six months – a monthly pay cut of about €1,000.

Frank Furedi, the executive director of the MCC Brussels think tank, who helped uncover the report, said: “The incidents referred to only represent the tip of the iceberg.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom