The Football League Paper

TV CASH MAKES IT CLOSED SHOP AT SUMMIT

-

SO much for the Premier League TV deal ushering in a golden new era of milk and honey. As far as I can deduce, all it’s really done is shaft the Football League.

Nobody is getting richer. The new TV rights package, worth £5.136bn over the next three years, represents a 71 per cent increase on the previous deal.

Meanwhile, this summer’s record-breaking £1.2bn transfer spend was a 37 per cent rise on last summer’s total.

On paper, that looks like a healthy balance sheet. But last summer’s cash was splashed in the knowledge that a big increase was round the corner, a tactic widely known as ‘a Ridsdale’.

For a more comparable figure, you have to go back to 2013, the first year of the previous rights deal.

Back then, Premier League clubs spent £630m, a whopping 90 per cent less than the 2016 outlay. Factor in rising wage costs and what you currently have are 20 clubs collective­ly spending twice what they used to on just three-quarters more income.

History suggests they will spend more again next year. And it’s not like they can even claim to be asset rich. Their players were bought at such a grotesquel­y inflated premium that nobody outside the Premier League could possibly afford them.

The Premier League offers relegated clubs parachute payments worth £87m. Thus cushioned, we have already seen Aston Villa and Newcastle account for all but one of the five most expensive signings in Championsh­ip history.

Even a relatively affluent club like Brighton were comprehens­ively outbid by Norwich for Alex Pritchard.

Right now, we are still in a position where Huddersfie­ld can top the table. Two years down the line, it is difficult to see how a club of their stature will stand a chance.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom