The Guardian Weekly

In his Maga heartlands, Trump is a victim not a defendant

- By David Smith WASHINGTON DAVID SMITH IS THE GUARDIAN AND OBSERVER’S WASHINGTON CORRESPOND­ENT

In one US, he cuts a diminished, humbled figure. “He seems considerab­ly older and he seems annoyed, resigned, maybe angry,” said broadcaste­r Rachel Maddow of MSNBC after seeing Donald Trump up close in court. “He seems like a man who is miserable to be here.”

But in the other US – that of Fox News, far-right podcasts and the Maga (Make America Great Again) base – the trial of the former president over a case involving a hush money payment to an adult film performer is playing out very differentl­y.

Here, anger at what is seen as political persecutio­n meets another emotion: sublime indifferen­ce. Barely a handful of Trump supporters bother to protest ro each day outside the court in Ne New York, a Democratic stronghold.

T The divergence ensures that, with TV cameras not permitted in court,

two rival narratives are forming around the first criminal trial of a former US president.

In one, Trump is a philandere­r who falsified business records to illegally influence the 2016 presidenti­al election. In the other, he is victim of a conspiracy designed to rob the Republican nominee of victory in 2024.

This trial would already be devastatin­g for any convention­al politician.

Former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker testified about his tabloid’s efforts to protect Trump from stories that could hurt his electoral chances. The capricious defendant is also awaiting a ruling on whether he will be held in contempt for violating a gag order, an offence he has been accused of 14 times.

The trial has dominated cable news networks such as CNN and MSNBC to the extent that they have faced criticism for obsessing over details including Trump’s daily commute to court and his demeanour once inside.

But in the Maga universe, there is a collective shrug.

Matt Gertz, a senior fellow at the watchdog Media Matters for America, said: “The rightwing media very much does not want to be talking about last week. On Fox, it’s one of many stories that they’re covering and not a particular­ly prominent one at that.”

When Trump-friendly networks do turn to the trial, they give viewers an alternativ­e narrative. After the hearing has wrapped up for the day, Fox News regularly carries live coverage of Trump’s diatribes against the judge, Joe Biden and the cold temperatur­e in the courtroom. They have even defended Trump – who regularly mocks Biden as “Sleepy Joe” – for falling asleep in court. Sean Hannity, a Fox News host, said on his radio show: “By the way, I think I’d fall asleep if I was there.”

But there is no sign that the airing of the charges that Trump falsified business records to cover up a hush money payment is shifting opinions.

Steve Robinson, 75, an engineer and contractor from Leesburg, Virginia, is following the trial via rightwing channels. “No CNN,” he said. “The charges are made up and it’s a travesty of justice. It’s embarrassi­ng for us as a country … It’s obviously a political witch-hunt. The leftists are enjoying it.”

Lynette Kennedy McQuain, 63, an insurance salesperso­n from Lost Creek, West Virginia, said: “New York should spend their tax dollars on criminal behaviour, rather than trying to take down a former president. It’s not illegal to pay money to quiet something if you want to.”

This trial is seen as potentiall­y the least serious of the four criminal cases against Trump, but it is likely to be the only one completed before the election. Opinion polls have tightened in recent weeks, with Biden closing the gap on Trump.

The former president is thought unlikely to testify, but the court will probably hear lurid, sordid details that even Trump’s allies in the media may find hard to resist. He is not out of danger yet.

Charlie Sykes, a political columnist and author of How the Right Lost Its Mind, said: “The danger of this trial for Trump and for the rightwing media is that many of the details are going to be quite salacious, quite dramatic and easily understood. Fox News is going to be torn between ‘this is pretty compelling material’ versus ‘it’s also pretty damaging’.”

But the experience of the past eight years suggests that Trump’s base understand­s who he is and is willing to accept it, sexual peccadillo­es and all.

 ?? ANGELA WEISS/AFP/GETTY ?? A pro-Trump demonstrat­or outside the Manhattan court building
ANGELA WEISS/AFP/GETTY A pro-Trump demonstrat­or outside the Manhattan court building

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom