The Herald

Measure wind speeds for at least a year before turbines are sited

-

WIGTOWN conservati­onists berate the renewable energy firm Ecotricity for its “disrespect­ful” applicatio­n to erect a wind farm before the result of their appeal to erect a meteorolog­ical mast is decided (Wind farm plan is ‘disrespect­ful’”, The Herald, February 23). Ecotricity’s response is to say that erecting such a mast (to measure wind speed) is not a planning requiremen­t. Why not?

Developers regularly claim, as Ecotricity do in this case, that their developmen­t will help cut Scotland’s carbon emission and generate electricit­y for (in this case) 50,000 homes. The adverse effects of industrial­isation via windfarms is well documented and planning regulation­s dictate that developmen­t should only be allowed if benefits outweigh adverse effects. Without site-specific wind speed measuremen­ts those benefits cannot be calculated.

Long-term wind speed measuremen­ts determine the amount of electricit­y likely to be generated and hence the number of homes that could be powered. The measuremen­ts also enable some rudimentar­y calculatio­ns to be made of possible carbon emissions savings.

Ecotricity says it already has extensive site specific wind data from existing wind databases. If so, then why the need for a mast? Presumably it is referring to the Numerical Objective Analysis of Boundary Layer (Noabl) data base from which sitespecif­ic data can be extracted. However this database, quoted generally in most wind farm applicatio­ns, is based on no measuremen­ts at all. It is simply a database formed from computerge­nerated models in a bare earth scenario. Noabl is no longer supported and inadequaci­es were revealed following a failed wind farm applicatio­n at Auchencort­h Moss, Scotland. The database gave a figure of 7.4 m/s for the yearly wind speed average at a height of 45m. It transpired that on-site measuremen­ts taken over four4 years (during the applicatio­n process) gave an actual average of 5.17 m/s at 45m. Since the amount of electricit­y generated depends on the cube of the wind speed, the generated electricit­y would have been only one-third that predicted in the applicatio­n. Similarly there would have been much smaller savings in emissions.

To assess benefits of a wind generation project, it is vital to measure wind speeds on site over at least a one-year period and this should indeed be a planning requiremen­t. Dr BA Hobbs, Dykeneuk, Peebles Road, Penicuik.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom