The Herald

£8,000 award over picture sacking

Tribunal rules worker in Facebook photograph was unfairly dismissed

- VICTORIA WELDON NEWS REPORTER

A HAULAGE worker who was sacked after posting a photograph of himself in a “sexually compromisi­ng position” at work has won his case for unfair dismissal.

Faisal Auld, a former chargehand for Norbert Dentressan­gle, uploaded the picture to Facebook, including a comment making sexually explicit remarks about Santa Claus.

The photograph, which showed the 31-year-old and another worker, had been Mr Auld’s cover photo on his page for five years when his newly appointed boss spotted it and reported it to the firm’s personnel department.

Norbert Dentressan­gle claimed the image, which showed the two men wearing their uniforms in a sexual position, could have been “detrimenta­l” to the business.

However, employment judge Robert Gall ruled in favour of Mr Auld, of Falkirk, and awarded him £8,083.63 as the firm had no social media policy in place.

The judge stated: “After careful analysis and considerat­ion of all the evidence and submission­s, I came to the clear view that the decision to dismiss in the circumstan­ces of this case lay outwith the band of reasonable responses of a reasonable employer. The dismissal is therefore unfair.”

The tribunal heard that newly appointed site manager Margaret Farquharso­n looked up Mr Auld’s Facebook page in June 2014 as she wanted to find out informatio­n about their “families, hobbies or interests”.

She then discovered the photograph, which had been on Mr Auld’s page since 2009, and showed him “holding [ his colleague] in a headlock in a sexually compromisi­ng position”.

Judge Gall also raised issues about the fact that Mrs Farquharso­n acted as the dismissing officer when she was the person who discovered the photograph.

Douglas Jaap, of Digby Brown, the firm that represente­d Mr Auld, said: “As has been made clear by Acas and others, employers need to not only have a clear social media policy in place but proactivel­y communicat­e it to their workforce.

“Among other findings, the tribunal in this case noted the absence of a social media policy.

“Given this lack of guidance, it was unfair and unreasonab­le for our client to have been dismissed from a job that he had held with an exemplary record for a number of years, and we were pleased the tribunal agreed with this.

Employers have a duty to communicat­e with their workplace and to act properly and fairly in any disciplina­ry matters, though the case does also highlight that employees need to be aware and responsibl­e when positing on social media sites.”

Mr Auld, who had 10 years’ service with the firm, now works as a charge hand for Aldi.

His award in the case was reduced by 30 per cent due to his conduct in posting the photograph.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom