TITLE CHASE

that the transfer of brake ducts from Mercedes to Racing Point did not constitute a “significant breach of the sporting regulations” and the sharing of data was within the rules.

But some in the paddock have questioned why Mercedes assisted Racing Point and the cosiness of team principal Toto Wolff’s relationship with Racing Point co-owner Lawrence Stroll.

But a defiant Wolff said after yesterday’s race: “If someone thinks we have done something wrong then they should protest, and we are happy to go to court.

“Our reputation is very important but it is intact. We have not been protested. We have done nothing wrong.

“I strongly believe that Racing

Point have done nothing wrong and if this goes to the International Court of Appeal, the lawyers and the barristers have a strong opinion that this is a case which has very solid pillars.”

Stroll said he was “appalled” by the behaviour of his rivals, accusing Ferrari, McLaren, Renault and Williams of dragging Racing Point’s name “through the mud”.

The four teams have all lodged their intention to appeal Racing Point’s FIA punishment. They are keen to understand if there could be other parts on the car which are identical to last year’s Mercedes – and do not believe the verdict to be severe enough.

But Canadian fashion billionaire Stroll issued a strongly-worded statement before yesterday’s 70th Anniversary race.

“I do not often speak publicly, however I am extremely angry at any suggestion we have been underhand or have cheated – particularly those comments coming from our competitors,” he said. “I have never cheated at anything in my life. These accusations are completely unacceptable and not true.

“I am appalled by the way Renault, McLaren, Ferrari and Williams have taken this opportunity to appeal, and in doing so attempted to detract from our performances. They are dragging our name through the mud and I will not stand by nor accept this.”