The Herald - The Herald Magazine

Joanna Blythman

-

HOW many ingredient­s does it take to make a burger? Purists will tell you one: beef, and nothing else. Others will want to sneak in salt, possibly black pepper, onion, maybe mustard. If you count the condiments, a convention­al burger contains no more than five ingredient­s.

So I laughed to see the Lightlife company, an upstart in the ‘plant-based’ burger market that’s dominated by the Impossible Foods and Beyond Meat brands, trying to steal a march on these more establishe­d competitor­s. “Our burger has only 11 ingredient­s – that’s it. Not 18 or 20”.

Are we meant to be impressed? Lightlife positions itself as the “clean” brand of burger lookalikes, “a real food company,” with products “developed in a kitchen, not a lab.”

I must pop round to my neighbour’s to ask her if I can borrow some of her pea protein, natural ‘flavors’, modified cellulose, beet powder and cherry powder, because I’ve run out.

To be fair to Lightlife though, most of us would have more chance of vaguely figuring out what these ingredient­s are compared to the rice protein and methylcell­ulose in the 18-ingredient Beyond Burger, or the cultured dextrose and geneticall­y modified soy leghemoglo­bin, in the 20-ingredient Impossible Burger.

I say that I laughed, but the joke will be on us if we buy such plant-based concoction­s.

Here’s the recipe. Mix sacks of white protein powder (isolated from soy or any proteinace­ous pulse) with loads of water, add industrial­ly refined oils, gluey stabiliser­s – derivative­s of wood chips – come in handy here then tart it up with synthetic additives: colourings, flavouring­s.

Voila! Sell this ultraproce­ssed confection to well-intentione­d, but naive consumers as planet-saving, and just watch the money flow into corporate coffers.

Currently on UK shelves, Beyond Burgers retail at £19.50 a kilo, a price that can only reflect what this Silicon Valley company thinks the “my sacrifice to halt climate breakdown” market will pay.

It certainly can’t be based on its cheap ingredient­s and factory production costs. I price checked Beyond Burgers against real beef burgers.

The costliest equivalent that

I could find in the genuine meat aisle of supermarke­ts was dry-aged Hereford steak burgers and organic beef burgers, selling for £10.30 and £12.50 a kilo respective­ly.

Techno-optimists, those people who relish the prospect of our food being created outwith nature’s realm, have been frenziedly talking up plant burgers for ages, claiming that sales are growing exponentia­lly.

As with every niche product, any uptick in sales can be portrayed as phenomenal progress when, in overall terms, it remains insignific­ant.

So while the value of the meatfree/plant-based category has risen by 15% this year, the proportion of households actually buying meatfree products dropped back.

UK sales of meat lookalikes actually slowed during peak lockdown.

Kantar data showed that only 12.5% of British households bought in to the meatfree category, down from 13.8% during the same period in 2019. Meanwhile, 71 per cent of UK household bought red meat, up from 67% a year ago.

This slowdown in sales of meat analogues continues. The YouGov Consumer Tracker shows that of those who do buy meat substitute­s, nearly a quarter have bought less since lockdown.

So while hi-tech food manufactur­ers await their gold rush, the gloss has come off their endeavour.

We are wising up to how bad these confection­s taste and the shockingly bad value they represent.

More people are unconvince­d by the simplistic Meat=Bad/ Plant=Good binary. Arguments for a return to regenerati­ve agricultur­e, in which livestock, in tandem with traditiona­l crop rotations, provide soil fertility and ecological resilience, are centre stage.

The more we probe the energy, water and other production costs of ultra-processed

ingredient­s, using all the dark arts of the food technologi­st to look like meat, the less we want to buy them.

My vegetarian friends, who cook at home and care about the provenance of the ingredient­s they eat, would never touch a fake-meat burger.

If I served them one, they’d think I’d gone mad. And they’d be right.

If you don’t want to eat meat, that’s your prerogativ­e. But fake food pretending to be meat? That really is the pits.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? A traditiona­l beef burger may be far better for the environmen­t than a ‘plant-based’ version
A traditiona­l beef burger may be far better for the environmen­t than a ‘plant-based’ version
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom