The Herald on Sunday

Ruth Davidson attacked over free prescripti­on policy U-turn

- BY ANDREW WHITAKER

RUTH Davidson has performed a shock U-turn after abandoning Scottish Tory opposition to free NHS prescripti­ons – a policy the party has attacked for years. The Scottish Tory manifesto will now commit to free prescripti­ons despite the party opposing the flagship SNP policy for the last decade. Davidson now describes the policy as “sound”, although she previously attacked free prescripti­ons, which were introduced by Alex Salmond after the SNP win in 2007, as a “publicly-funded bribe” to win independen­ce.

Davidson’s U-turn now puts her in opposition to her party’s policy in England and Wales which is to retain charging. The policy change was attacked by political rivals as evidence of Tory “opportunis­m”.

Last night, Salmond described the shift as a “Damascene conversion” by Davidson, adding that the Tories were now trying to “mimic the success of the SNP” in a desperate bid to get MPs elected in Scotland.

Salmond, who is standing for re-election in Gordon, said: “The SNP’s flagship free prescripti­ons policy has been an overwhelmi­ng success and is one of the reasons that people continue to put their trust in the SNP after 10 years in government. Ruth Davidson used to describe free prescripti­ons as a ‘publicly-funded bribe’ – but this Damascene conversion shows even the Tories can reluctantl­y recognise it is the SNP that pursues the right policies for Scotland.”

Davidson’s U-turn puts her at odds with Theresa May, whose government is responsibl­e for charges of £8.60 per item south of the Border. She announced the policy as part of the General Election campaign for Westminste­r, even though prescripti­ons is a policy area devolved to Holyrood which holds powers over health.

Scottish Secretary David Mundell, who serves in May’s Cabinet, will now be standing on the policy of retaining free prescripti­ons, despite the Prime Minister’s opposition.

The Scottish Tories said the change in stance was because medication is playing a growing role as an alternativ­e to hospital care. However, Davidson admitted the shift was also motivated by the “large amount of support” for free prescripti­ons in Scotland. She said it was aimed at boosting the party’s support in Scotland and positionin­g the Tories as an alternativ­e party of government at Holyrood.

Speaking to journalist­s at Holyrood, she said: “Last year, we got a result that a lot of people didn’t expect. My challenge for the next few years is to turn us into a credible alternativ­e government in Scotland and this is part of that. There is large amount of support for this policy and we recognise that.” She added: “So we think that it’s a sound one [policy].”

Davidson confirmed that she would appoint a health advisory board in the coming weeks to examine how best to make the policy shift. Her volte-face was savaged as opportunis­m leading to claims from Scottish Labour health spokesman Anas Sarwar that she “will do and say anything” to get Tory MPs elected in Scotland in the General Election on June 8.

Sarwar added: ”This is an embarrassi­ng U-turn by the Tories. All this humiliatin­g shift shows is that once again the Tories simply can’t be trusted on the NHS.”

Health spokesman for the Scottish Greens, Alison Johnstone, echoing the criticism, added: “The Tories will have people scratching their heads on this one, wondering what the real reasons are for the U-turn, welcome as it is. Everyone knows the Tories at Westminste­r are desperate to privatise the NHS down south and you only have to look at their recent treatment of junior doctors to see how they view NHS staff.”

Davidson claimed the policy was one of a number of areas where the Scottish Tories had a different stance to the party at Westminste­r. “In the 2015 General Election campaign there were difference­s between the UK party manifesto and the Scottish manifesto, on both devolved and reserved issues, on things like the right to buy. I would expect in the next couple of weeks that when the manifestos come out there will be divergence­s there.”

Scottish Tory health spokesman Donald Cameron said the party had decided to back free NHS prescripti­ons partly because of the popularity of the policy. However, he insisted it was more about adapting to changes in the way the NHS delivers care. The MSP said: “There is no doubt at all that people in Scotland value the idea of free prescripti­ons. We have listened to them, and changed our policy.”

Topic of the week: local elections – the reckoning

YOUR leader should be required reading for all patriotic Scots (The local elections and the canary in the coal mine, Editorial, May 7). The Tories are indeed toxic, and their impending landslide in Greater England (which now includes swathes of the Borders and northeast Scotland) will prove – ironically – to spell the end of the Union, at last.

David Cameron’s unnecessar­y referendum and Theresa May’s bungling of Brexit is leading the “United” Kingdom into petty chauvinism and economic disaster. Trump’s USA and the bits of the old Empire with a Union flag still incorporat­ed into theirs will not ride to Britain’s rescue for old times’ sake.

The SNP will convincing­ly win the election in Scotland – with between 45 and 50 seats is my guess. Once the dust settles, and the full horror of the prospect of 20-plus years of Anglo-centric rule (who imagines that a Tory Westminste­r will look kindly on an “ungrateful” Scotland’s needs?) sinks in, I believe a great number of Scots will realise there is no alternativ­e to independen­ce.

If Theresa May – or her successor, after the men in grey suits call – refuses to “grant” a constituti­onally-binding referendum, then the Scottish Government should press on with a consultati­ve one. If the great opportunit­ies and benefits of running our own country are clearly explained, even the “black-tops” of the cruder “red-tops” and media will surely not prevent the Scots this time from choosing the road less travelled. David Roche Perth LABOUR won 32 council seats in Glasgow against the SNP’s 39, yet Paul Hutcheon pronounced the party “dead on arrival” (Here’s how Labour lost control of Glasgow, The battle for Scotland, May 7).

Yes, the SNP won the election, but they did not destroy the Labour Party in Scotland as many of their supporters promised to do, encouraged by the rhetoric (uncritical­ly reported) of their leaders. Their efforts did, however, drive some supporters of the Union into the arms of the Conservati­ve Party, all set to boost the fortunes of the appalling Theresa May. Well done, Nicola! Alison Gray Glasgow IN claiming that the case for a second Scottish referendum is “sunk”, the Scottish Conservati­ves appear to be indulging in some wishful thinking. The Tories obsessed about the constituti­on all through the local government election campaign but the indisputab­le fact is that the SNP won the election, gaining more votes and more seats than any other party, which confirms that the case for a second independen­ce referendum remains buoyant. Ruth Marr Stirling

 ?? Photograph: Jane Barlow/PA Wire ?? Ruth Davidson said she was motivated by the ‘large amount of support’ for free prescripti­ons in Scotland
Photograph: Jane Barlow/PA Wire Ruth Davidson said she was motivated by the ‘large amount of support’ for free prescripti­ons in Scotland
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom