The Herald on Sunday

Would you visit a place of horror for fun? Dark Tourism under the spotlight

SPECIAL REPORT

- BY SARAH MCMULLAN

DARK Tourism – which sees travellers visit sites of horror such as Auschwitz, Cambodia, Yugoslavia and Northern Ireland – is to be studied by academics in Scotland for the first time. A conference at Glasgow’s Caledonian University will explore the moral issues thrown up by Western tourists travelling for pleasure to places where mass murder, horrific atrocities and genocide have occurred.

Running from June 28 to July 1, the gathering will address how best to approach visits to dark tourism sites related to the Holocaust in particular. The conference will explore the most appropriat­e ways for nations with violent pasts to “practise” this type of tourism.

Professor John Lennon of Glasgow Caledonian University is organising the conference alongside the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum and the Institute for Contempora­ry History in Berlin. Lennon coined the term “dark tourism” in the 1990s, referring to the innate human interest in places where extreme atrocities have been carried out.

He said: “The 21st-century tourist has a fascinatio­n with visiting sites of genocide, mass killing, exterminat­ion and incarcerat­ion,” said Lennon. “Tourism is not separate from these ideas of atrocity; when people are on holiday in places like Krakow in Poland, Auschwitz, which is nearby, is considered part of the package.

“Just like if you went to New York you might go to the Ground Zero site of 9/11 or the museum there to commemorat­e the people who died. This idea of visiting ‘dark’ places has become part of the fabric of tourism.” A spike in visits to concentrat­ion camps in 2015 reflects this enduring preoccupat­ion with Nazi Germany. Germany’s treatment of its controvers­ial history is regarded as an exemplary exercise in how to sensitivel­y and respectful­ly preserve and promote sites of killing as places of remembranc­e.

A small plaque notes the place of Hitler’s death in Berlin to avoid public speculatio­n, but over one million people visit Auschwitz each year to experience unfiltered history first-hand. Time is considered the biggest factor in determinin­g when dark tourism can operate freely and when it is considered distastefu­l, Lennon said.

Now in 2017, the horrors of Nazi Germany are a long way from our everyday lives today, and as this becomes the case for our more recent atrocities, tourists are showing increasing interest in a range of “dark” sites the world over. People make their way around the murals of Belfast which defined the divisivene­ss of Northern Ireland during The Troubles. In the comfort of a black cab their tour is made real with facts about murders, imprisonme­nt and the peace process.

In Cambodia’s capital Phnom Penh, tourists make their way to the notorious Killing Fields and Tuol Sleng Genocide museum. With just 30 per cent of its population over 30, Cambodia is a nation still reeling from its bloody past.

Ghoulish signs across the countrysid­e warn visitors to watch their step while walking through the sites as rain constantly unearths bones from mass graves not yet excavated.

Dark tourism is not considered a new phenomenon – Auschwitz took on museum status in 1947, two years after it was liberated – but our increasing­ly commercial­ised lives mean that the way dark tourism sites are presented has an impact on how we interact with history, and can sometimes cause controvers­y.

Imogen Dalziel will deliver a talk at the conference called Book Auschwitz: Get a free lunch. An expert in Holocaust studies, she critiques the use of death camps to prop up the tourism industry. “Holocaust sites are becoming more commercial­ised by external companies, who cannot ignore the increase in tourists and try to profit0. In visitor shops opposite Auschwitz you can now buy souvenir plates, fridge magnets, thimbles and even crudité bowls adorned with images of both gates.”

FOR those who were actually there and lived through the horrors of the Nazi death camps, this perceived trivialisa­tion of their experience­s can cause distress and anger. David Shapiro, whose wife Angela is speaking at the conference, escaped Nazi Germany as a child and settled in Scotland after the war. As a man whose grandparen­ts are suspected to have died on their way to Auschwitz he refuses to go. “For me, there is no necessity, it wouldn’t add anything to my experience­s. It all seems a bit ghoulish, looking at people’s hair and shoes and the destructio­n … it certainly isn’t a pilgrimage. My brother used to run tours there from Israel and it was always something I struggled with.”

While places like Auschwitz and Cambodia’s Killing Fields are scenes of the most shocking largescale atrocities in history, the draw of dark tourism has also filtered down to smaller sites of tragedy. The house of Fred and Rosemary West in Gloucester was demolished to stop souvenir hunters looting the site, and local authoritie­s had to intervene to stop coaches diverting to Dunblane after the massacre of 16 schoolchil­dren and their teacher. In another chilling example, tourists have been spotted eating lunch at the grave of Holly Chapman and Jessica Wells, who were murdered in Soham by Ian Huntley in 2002.

 ??  ?? Auschwitz’s popularity will be a major focus of the Dark Tourism conference at Caledonian University Photograph: Sean Gallup/Getty Images
Auschwitz’s popularity will be a major focus of the Dark Tourism conference at Caledonian University Photograph: Sean Gallup/Getty Images

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom