The Herald on Sunday

SNP criticised over lack of clarity in planned FOI reforms

- By Paul Hutcheon

SCOTLAND’S Informatio­n Commission­er has slapped down Nicola Sturgeon’s Government over her planned reforms to handling Freedom of Informatio­n requests.

Ministers agreed to make changes after the watchdog issued a critical report into the way the Government dealt with FOI in relation to groups including journalist­s.

Daren Fitzhenry, the SIC, has now expressed concern about an apparent lack of “clarity” in the continuing role of special advisers and ministers in the process.

Scotland’s FOI law, which came into force in 2005, gives citizens a right to informatio­n held by public bodies, unless it is covered by an exemption.

However, journalist­s last year signed an open letter complainin­g about the way the SNP Government handled requests. They complained of delaying tactics and requests being blocked or refused for tenuous reasons.

The reporters also claimed their questions were being routinely handled by special advisers, who are political appointees, and screened for political damage.

Fitzhenry launched a review into the claims and he found that Government policy reinforced concerns of a two-tier system for journalist­s, MSPs and political researcher­s. He concluded there had been “unjustifia­ble, significan­t delays and disregard for the statutory timescales” and noted the Government took longer to respond to journalist­s’ requests than others.

His report also stated that the Government policies and procedures were not “clear enough about the role of special advisers in responding to FOI requests”.

Opposition­s politician­s claimed the role of special advisers amounted to interferen­ce in FOIs. However, the Government’s “draft action plan” makes clear that special advisers – otherwise known as spads – will still have a role at the end of the process.

In his response to Government, Fitzhenry said he was “content” with the “majority” of the proposed actions, but noted: “Cases identified as sensitive or exceptiona­lly complex will be referred to special advisers and ministers for ‘comment’ after ‘clearance’. I am concerned that this will not provide the desired clarity or transparen­cy.”

Neil Findlay, Scottish Labour’s parliament­ary business manager, said: “The SNP Government’s response to the damning report earlier this year into their misuse of Freedom of Informatio­n laws is nothing more than a sham.

“Instead of stopping politician­s and taxpayer-funded spin doctors interferin­g in journalist­s’ requests they have institutio­nalised it.”

A Government spokespers­on said: “The Scottish Government co-operated fully with the Scottish Informatio­n Commission­er’s comprehens­ive independen­t review of our Freedom of Informatio­n practice and performanc­e.

“FoI legislatio­n allows for special advisers and ministers to be involved in the process and that the Commission­er found no misuse of FoI law by the Scottish Government. It is important to note that at no point in any of the seven key recommenda­tions in the Commission­er’s report does he suggest that special advisers should not continue to provide advice to ministers and colleagues.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom