The Herald

Catalonia referendum is fraught with problems for all concerned

- DANIEL CETRA Daniel Cetra is a researcher on nationalis­m and independen­ce movements at Edinburgh University’s Centre on Constituti­onal Change.

IT IS TEMPTING to think of Catalonia and Scotland as being in a similar position. Both have pro-independen­ce government­s, which enjoy parliament­ary majorities owing to the support of smaller secessioni­st parties.

Around 45 per cent of Catalans and Scots support independen­ce. And both nations see demands to hold independen­ce referendum­s – in Catalonia they have been running strong since 2012 and there is wide support (80 per cent) for a referendum, assuming the Spanish government agrees to it.

Despite these similariti­es, the difference­s are also significan­t.

Scots voted in an independen­ce referendum supported by the British Government, while Catalans may vote in a referendum opposed by Madrid.

The position of the Spanish government and most Spanish parties has always been that such a referendum is unconstitu­tional. The strategy of the Spanish government has been to challenge a plebiscite via the Constituti­onal Court.

After several requests to hold a negotiated referendum, there has been six consecutiv­e years of mass pro-independen­ce demonstrat­ions on Catalonia’s national day – most recently this weekend. Now the Catalan government has decided to organise an independen­ce referendum unilateral­ly.

It has already held a symbolic vote on independen­ce in 2014, and a subsequent election that returned a pro-independen­ce majority.

The new referendum has been called for October 1, amid deep political tension between the government­s and, within Catalonia, between pro-independen­ce and unionist parties.

The referendum law has already been suspended by the Constituti­onal Court, and Spain’s attorney general has ordered security forces to prevent any preparatio­ns for the vote. However, the Catalan government has announced that it will go ahead and that the vote will be binding.

The situation reflects a debate between legal and democratic legitimacy. In contrast with British unionism, the appeal to unionism in Spain has become a predominan­tly legal argument.

There are also competing visions of sovereignt­y and nationhood. The view of a single Spanish sovereignt­y enshrined in the constituti­on is supported by all unionist parties except Podemos.

Amid increasing political tension, both

the outcome and consequenc­es of the referendum are uncertain. Two key issues will be turnout and the Spanish Government’s response. Perhaps paradoxica­lly, independen­ce supporters need unionists to get out and vote and take part in the debate.

A turnout of 50 per cent or higher would be a success for the Catalan government, giving the referendum legitimacy and putting the Spanish Government in a difficult position. A turnout similar to the 2014 symbolic vote (36 per cent) would be a defeat for the Catalan Government, probably putting an end to the independen­ce project for some time.

In terms of results, and again paradoxica­lly for the independen­ce movement, a narrow Yes victory would be preferable to a large victory. It would make the vote more legitimate as it would better reflect actual public opinion. The most recent poll suggests that 41 per cent of

Catalans support independen­ce while 49 per cent oppose it.

The Spanish government’s goal is to prevent the referendum – and, if that is not possible or convenient, to encourage as low a turnout as possible. Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy has two main options. First, is to seek to prevent the vote using ordinary methods.

This means treating the referendum as a case of civil disobedien­ce and deploying security forces to prevent any preparatio­n for the vote

This would make it difficult for the referendum to be held and could have a negative impact on turnout. Alternativ­ely, Mr Rajoy could seek to prevent the vote using exceptiona­l methods – for example suspending Catalonia’s political autonomy.

This is a double-edged sword, while it could prevent the referendum, it would also be seen by many Catalans as a disproport­ionate reaction that would

further discredit Spain’s institutio­ns and strengthen the independen­ce cause.

The focus on the constituti­on is unhelpful because this is a political dispute, not a legal one: it is the very concept of a single Spanish nation which is being contested.

Yet holding an independen­ce referendum opposed by the full weight of the state and which could potentiall­y be hostage to a boycott by most Catalan unionists is not without problems.

Even if turnout is significan­t and independen­ce wins comfortabl­y, it is unclear how such a mandate could be implemente­d unilateral­ly. If the referendum is a success, the Spanish government will face a serious crisis. Yet that currently looks very unlikely.

It reflects a debate between legal and democratic legitimacy

 ??  ?? A La Pedrera in Barcelona, designed by Antoni Gaudi, is decorated with a Catalonian flag during a demonstrat­ion yesterday marking Catalan National Day.
A La Pedrera in Barcelona, designed by Antoni Gaudi, is decorated with a Catalonian flag during a demonstrat­ion yesterday marking Catalan National Day.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom