The Herald

Murderer’s family fear destroying evidence will end fight for justice

-

a life sentence. His stepmother Linda Gilroy said: “To get rid of evidence at this stage denies David the chance to commission experts to show how badly some of the key evidence used to convict him is wrong.

“Scotland seems to be out of line with England and Wales and other modern jurisdicti­ons in getting rid of evidence at such an early point in a sentence. How many other Scottish prisoners have been, or will be, robbed of the chance to prove that they have been wrongfully convicted?”

Sentencing Gilroy in 2012, Lord Bracadale spoke of the “quite chilling calmness” with which Gilroy set about disposing of the body. He was described in court as possessive and manipulati­ve.

He had sent her more than 400 texts in the month before she went missing, but these stopped when she vanished.

The day after Ms Pilley went missing Gilroy drove from Edinburgh to Lochgilphe­ad.

Suzanne Pilley’s body was never found.

Killer David Gilroy jailed for 18 years.

The police found he took two hours longer to get there than the average time, and the return journey was even longer.

Officers were convinced he had driven his car off road on that day, and found he had cuts and bruises on his hands and face.

Gilroy now hopes to seek expert opinions on key evidence in the case. But his supporters fear the COPFS action will destroy vital evidence denying him the chance to prove he is not guilty of the murder.

COPFS claims it is impractica­l to continue to store such evidence and there is no need. “Given that there are now no further appeal proceeding­s ongoing, the Crown has authorised the release of all production­s,” the agency said.

Euan McIlvride, of the Glasgow-based Miscarriag­e of Justice Organisati­on (MOJO) Scotland, said: “If you look at some of the high-profile examples where conviction­s have been overturned – such as TC Campbell, Joseph Steele and Paddy Hill – they all took more than one appeal.

“For the Crown Office to take the view that it is one strike and you are out is harsh. It is entirely wrong that they are able to deny access to justice to the very people they prosecuted.”

A spokesman for the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission said “We reviewed Mr Gilroy’s case and concluded there was no reason to believe there to have been a miscarriag­e of justice.”

A spokeswoma­n for COPFS said that while the law states evidence must be retained until a convict is released from custody in England and Wales, there is no such law in Scotland.

“David Gilroy was convicted of murder and his appeal and applicatio­n to the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission were unsuccessf­ul. As such there is no legal basis for COPFS to retain the production­s relating to this case,” she said.

Sir David Attenborou­gh drew 11 million viewers.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom