The Independent

US Congress overrides veto on suing Saudi over 9/11

- FELIKS GARCIA IN NEW YORK

Congress voted yesterday to override President Barack Obama's veto of a bill that would allow families of 9/11 victims to sue for damages from the Saudi Arabian government for the attacks.

Both chambers of Congress voted by an overwhelmi­ng margin to override the President's veto of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA), marking the first time Congress has successful­ly overruled a veto during Mr Obama's two terms.

Early yesterday afternoon, the Senate voted against the veto by 97 to one, with minority leader Harry Reid

acting as the only dissenter. A few hours later, the House of Representa­tives voted 348 to 77.

"Overriding a presidenti­al veto is something we don't take lightly, but it was important in this case that the families of the victims of 9/11 be allowed to pursue justice, even if that pursuit causes some diplomatic discomfort­s," said Democratic New York Senator Charles E Shumer, who co-authored the bill with Republican Texas Senator John Cornyn.

White House press secretary Josh Earnest called the vote "the single most embarrassi­ng thing the Senate has done" in decades. Mr Reid was the sole dissenter in the vote, while senators Bernie Sanders and Tim Kaine were absent.

Mr Obama vetoed the bill on Friday, citing concerns that JASTA could open up US officials to foreign lawsuits.

"Removing sovereign immunity in US courts from foreign government­s that are not designated as state sponsors of terrorism, based solely on allegation­s that such foreign government­s' actions abroad had a connection to terrorism-related injuries on US soil, threatens to undermine these longstandi­ng principles that protect the United States, our forces, and our personnel," Mr Obama wrote in his veto message to Congress. Both the Senate and the House passed the bill unanimousl­y in May.

Fifteen of the 19 hijackers who flew planes into the World Trade Centre and Pentagon in September 2001 were Saudi citizens, although Riyadh has denied having any role in supporting the attackers. The 9/11 Commission found no evidence of Saudi involvemen­t in the attacks. Saudi officials have previously threatened to sell up $750bn in US securities and other assets if the bill becomes law.

 ??  ?? The World Trade Centre during the terror attack on 11 September 2001
The World Trade Centre during the terror attack on 11 September 2001

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom