The Independent

Refugees arriving in UK becoming homeless once they’re granted asylum

- MAY BULMAN

Refugees in the UK are being consigned to hunger and homelessne­ss immediatel­y after they are granted asylum, a report has found, in what has been described as a “timely wake-up call” about the plight of refugees seeking sanctuary in the UK.

The research, published by the All-Party Parliament­ary Group (APPG) on Refugees, shows government policies are creating a costly “two-tier system” of refugee protection, with those who entered the country

on government-led resettleme­nt schemes generally provided for, but others often being left homeless and destitute – often damaging their prospects of integratio­n.

A combinatio­n of delays and confusion about important paperwork from government department­s, a “cliffedge” of support following a positive decision on refugee status and poor English language provision are leading to refugees who want to contribute their skills and talents to the UK facing a number of barriers, the report warned. It reported “worrying” delays in the issuing of National Insurance numbers – necessary for newly recognised refugees to be able to gain access to finance and housing once their asylum support is ended – which is resulting in newly recognised refugees becoming destitute.

The 28-day period given to asylum seekers after they are successful in their applicatio­n before the Home Office stops giving them support – known as the “move on” period – is too short, the report found, with the brevity of the move-on period leaving “too many newly recognised refugees homeless and destitute”.

One refugee, Anas from Syria, was left unable to access jobseekers support or secure accommodat­ion after the Home Office made a spelling mistake on his official paperwork, which resulted in him spending five months homeless, jobless and without any financial support. Speaking to researcher­s, Anas said: “ISIS and Assad mean that it’s no longer safe for me at home. When I arrived in Britain I was so thankful to have been offered safety.

“All I wanted was to be a good person and give back to the country which sheltered me – but I couldn’t for no better reason than because my paperwork was wrong and it took five months to fix it. I will always be grateful to Britain, but I will never understand a system which stops people like me from getting on my feet and contributi­ng to society.”

A programme under the last Labour government, called the Refugee Integratio­n and Employment Service, offered 12 months of support to access housing, education, social security and the job market, but was ended under the coalition government in September 2011. Since then, there has been no government provided support service for refugees who have been through the asylum system.

The report also found that JobCentre staff who are dealing with refugees did not always provide the right informatio­n or have awareness of the correct procedures, leading to delays in refugees being able to access support. Refugees also face problems opening bank accounts, frequently as a result of being unable to provide documentat­ion banks ask for, the evidence shows.

Separately, it found that many female refugees were at risk of sexual and gender-based violence once they arrive in the UK, due to being financiall­y dependent on a partner and facing barriers to services such as English language classes. Commenting on the report’s findings, Thangam Debbonaire, Labour MP for Bristol West and Chair of the APPG, told The Independen­t it was “bizarre” that the Home Office was preventing refugees from integratin­g into society by making it difficult to do simple things like finding accommodat­ion and getting a job.

“If you don’t get issued with the five pieces of documentat­ion in time – which few do – you will have a high chance of being destitute without 28 days,” Ms Debbonaire said. “There’s a huge contrast between the elation that people thought they were going to feel when they were granted asylum, and the fact that immediatel­y they face eviction from their asylum accommodat­ion. They can’t apply for benefits, they can’t work – they can’t do anything.

“These are people who have come here with very little, and haven’t been allowed to work up until that point. Then suddenly they’re asked to find a flat or accommodat­ion in the private sector. I would struggle in 28 days – and I’ve got a good job. These are not asylum seekers whose claims are in dispute. These are people who the Home Office has decided are refugees. And that’s a really high bar, because they don’t grant it easily. To instantly make it hard for those who have been granted asylum to integrate seems

bizarre.

“It doesn’t help the UK population to feel like they are able to welcome refugees if the refugees themselves aren’t in a position to integrate if they want to. British The refugees I met had all gone to enormous lengths to learn English, to try keep up their qualificat­ions or get volunteeri­ng experience­s. They want to work; they don’t want to claim benefits. It doesn’t help refugees and it doesn’t help the indigenous population – it doesn’t make any sense.”

Stephen Hale, chief executive of Refugee Action, said the report served as a “timely wake-up call” for the Government to help refugees rebuild their lives and avoid “wasting their talents”. “The new Government must seize the opportunit­y to enable all refugees in Britain, regardless of how they arrive, to successful­ly rebuild their lives,” Mr Hale said. ”English language classes are critical to this. All parties should commit to increase funding for this in the next Parliament, so that refugees' skills and experience­s can enrich our culture and benefit our economy.

“Refugees are determined to learn English and start contributi­ng to their new communitie­s through volunteeri­ng, work and socialisin­g with their neighbours. But as the report highlights, they face huge barriers to integratio­n. Our own research shows refugees are waiting up to two years to start English language lessons – this is a shocking waste of their talents.”

Alex Fraser, director of Refugee Support at the British Red Cross, meanwhile said: “This report confirms what we see on a daily basis: that all too often, people who have come to the UK after fleeing conflict or persecutio­n are being left destitute and reliant on charity to survive.

“By definition, a refugee has had to leave their home country because their life is in danger. A two-tier system, where refugees who arrive in the UK as asylum seekers are at risk of being left homeless or living hand-to-mouth, is completely at odds with the supportive and welcoming spirit behind the government’s Syrian Resettleme­nt Programme.

“No one should be left destitute as a side effect of being granted protection in this country. We strongly encourage the Government to take notice of this report, in particular its recommenda­tion to extend the ‘move-on’ period* from 28 days.”

 ??  ?? Research shows government policies are creating a costly ‘two-tier system’ of refugee protection (Shuttersto­ck)
Research shows government policies are creating a costly ‘two-tier system’ of refugee protection (Shuttersto­ck)

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom