Anger at Labour rally plan
THE JEWISH Labour Movement’ s decision to invite controversial party figures to speak at a rally against antisemitism has been attacked by supporters who claim it will make the group “a laughing stock”.
Activists called for Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell, MP Naz Shah, and Baroness Chakrabarti to be barred from the event.
The proposed line-up for the rally prompted anger from moderate JLM supporters, with some threatening to resign.
Unveiling the list of speakers on Tuesday, Jeremy Newmark, JLM chair, said he hoped it would be a “healing and unifying moment” for the party.
But one senior Jewish Labour figure said: “Members like me will have to consider our positions. The issue is a lack of confidence in the judgement of JLM after this.”
The rally is due to take place on the first evening of Labour’s annual conference in Liverpool on September 25.
MPs who have been critical of Jeremy Corbyn were not informed they would be sharing a platform with hard-left figures, the JC understands.
One Jewish Labour supporter said: “JLM will look like a laughing stock. This is going to give legitimacy to their views.”
On Monday Mr McDonnell shared a platform with Jackie Walker, who was suspended from Labour for claiming Jews were the “chief financiers of the sugar and slave trade”.
Mr New mark said that Mr McDonnell had been invited before appearing with Ms Walker. He said: “He must explain his defence of Walker which is inconsistent with his call for zero tolerance. This raises serious questions. Our members expect him to explain himself.”
Members will have to consider their positions’
CALLING THE 500-strong audience to attention in the school hall, Raphi Bloom offered a word of advice be fitting a stern headmaster.
Mr Bloom, vice-chair of North West Friends of Israel, urged the crowd at Manchester’s King David High School to respect the guest who was about to come on to the stage.
A nervous Shami Chakrabarti, author of the controversial inquiry into allegations of antisemitism in the Labour Party, duly received a polite welcome.
Organisers from NW FoI had convinced her the community members in the crowd “would not lynch her” following weeks of criticism surrounding her report and elevation to the House of Lords.
Baroness Chakrabarti took her seat in the upper chamber on Tuesday.
Interviewed by Simon Johnson, chief executive of the Jewish Leadership Council, she said: “It has not been the most pleasant summer of my life but you can’t run away from issues.” The former director of human rights group Liberty defended her integrity and said if she were asked again, she would still carry out the investigation into antisemitism. Baroness Chakrabarti said: “I knew antisemitism on the left and in the Labour Party was a problem. “That is why I said yes to do the inquiry in the first place and I would do it again.” It was unfair, she argued, to label the inquiry a “whitewash”. Clinging to a copy of the 20-page document she added: “I think I would ask people to read my report and engage with it.” Baroness Chak ra bar ti also denied reports she had missed a deadline set by the Home Affairs Select Committee to explain conversations she had about the peer age with Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. S he said she explained herself to former committee chair Keith Vaz.
The audience listened silently as she told them the peerage had not been “a happy thing” because of the abuse she received since it was announced.
“It has not been the happiest moment of my life but it hasn’t been the worst either. I am not a refugee drowning in the Mediterranean. So I will suck it up and do my best.”
The peer said it was of “great regret” the party had not yet implemented the recommendations she made in the report.
One Prestwich resident asked if Baroness Chakrabarti felt not being Jewish had hindered her ability to understand antisemitism.
Baroness Chakrabarti replied: “I don’t know what it is like being Jewish, in the same way you don’t know what it is like being me. I don’t know what it is like to be called a ‘Yid’ either, but I do know what it is like to be called a ‘Paki’, so there are similarities.”
Baroness Chakrabarti was asked by the JC why she had not made any reference in her report to evidence submitted by Joshua Simons, a Jewish former policy adviser in Mr Corbyn’s office who said the leadership had “at least a blind spot with antisemitism and at worst a wilful disregard for it”.
She said the omission of his name had been a matter of confidentiality. Mr Simons has gone public with his evidence since the report was published in June.
As the meeting concluded, the baroness made a hasty exit, and was ushered into a waiting taxi by an aide.
Audience member Keith Fairclough, who travelled from Liverpool, said: “I think she was brave and at least she turned up.
“She was too liberal and let too much go in the inquiry itself. She should have been stronger on a lot of things.”
Following the event , Mr Johnson said: “She knew what she was doing. The audience can judge her for themselves.
“I think she warmed up, her body language at the start was very defensive but softened when she realised they weren’ t out to get her.”