The Jewish Chronicle

Why was Michael Gove so reluctant to condemn this man’s racist regime?

-

MICHAEL GOVE has been criticised for his “shameful” unwillingn­ess to condemn the Hungarian Prime Minister over antisemiti­sm and xenophobia, after Tory MEPs refused to vote for taking action against Viktor Orbán’s government.

The Environmen­t Secretary was asked why his party’s MEPs last week opposed triggering the EU’s most serious disciplina­ry procedure against Hungary, which stands accused of “pandering to antisemiti­sm”.

The refusal caused a surge of anger and Lord Finkelstei­n, the Jewish Conservati­ve peer, called it “very distressin­g” and “a shameful thing to have happened”.

Appearing on the Andrew Marr Show on Sunday, Mr Gove said he would not “go down that route, play that game” when asked to condemn Mr Orbán.

He said: “I have views, but I’m not going to be drawn on my views of individual European leaders.”

Mr Marr suggested that unwillingn­ess was “because you need his support.”

Mr Gove said: “No. Because I think it would be wrong for me, at a time when we need solidarity against a number of different threats — you mentioned antisemiti­sm — we need to make sure that our voice is clear, our position on these issues is absolutely clear and resonant.

“And I don’t believe that individual criticisms of the kind that you are understand­ably tempting me to make necessaril­y help us in ensuring that we get both solidarity on the issues that count and the best deal for Britain as we leave the European Union.”

Dr David Hirsch, of Goldsmiths University and author of Contempora­ry Left Antisemiti­sm, said: “It is striking that some people find it easy to recognise racism and antisemiti­sm within political movements that they hate but that sometimes the same people are completely unable to recognise it within movements they believe are fundamenta­lly good and they wish to support.

“Even more worrying is the suggestion that a person who does recognise antisemiti­sm would pretend not to in the hope of gaining some advantage in return from the antisemite.”

He added: “The idea that Britain would now cosy up to an antisemiti­c and racist strong-man regime... is shameful.”

Dave Rich, deputy communicat­ions director of the Community Security Trust and the author of The Left’s Jewish Problem: Jeremy Corbyn, Israel and Antisemiti­sm, said: “It would be worrying if wider policy considerat­ions made ministers reluctant to condemn antisemiti­c campaigns by foreign leaders.

“But it must be remembered that Michael Gove has a strong and consistent record of standing up against antisemiti­sm and supporting the Jewish community, unlike many of the people who have criticised him for his comments.”

Mr Orbán has attacked refugees as “Muslim invaders” and waged a campaign against Jewish Hungarian billionair­e George Soros, who survived the Holocaust as a child and who the Hungarian PM accused of wanting to “take over” the country.

In the run-up to his re-election this year, Mr Orbán gave a speech full of antisemiti­c tropes.

“We are fighting an enemy that is different from us,” he said. “They do not fight directly, but by stealth; they are not honourable, but unprincipl­ed; they are not national, but internatio­nal; they do not believe in work, but speculate with money; they have no homeland, but feel that the whole world is theirs.

“They are not generous, but vengeful, and always attack the heart.”

During his interview on Sunday, Mr Gove said Tory MEPs voted against action only because they did not believe the EU should “interfere in or censure the internal democracy of a particular country”.

He said: “That is very, very far from endorsing or supporting the positions that [Mr Orbán] takes.”

 ?? PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES ??
PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom