The Jewish Chronicle

6c ZmeZg^bZci ^c ÒcY^c\ a^b^i

- DANIEL SUGARMAN

struggled to contain the anger within the party over their continued failing to tackle to Jew-hate in the aftermath of Monday’s resignatio­ns.

On Wednesday, when asked on the BBC2 Politics Live show if he agreed with comments made by Tom Watson that Luciana Berger had been driven out of the party by “racist bullies”, shadow cabinet member Jon Trickett, who is also a member of Labour’s ruling national executive committee (NEC) said: “I’ve not seen that evidence”.

But comments which appeared to put him at odds with Jeremy Corbyn, Mr McDonnell said Labour should launch a “mammoth, massive listening exercise” and address the concerns that led to eight Labour MPs resigning. Responding to comments on Monday by deputy leader Tom Watson that more MPs could leave unless Labour tackled antisemiti­sm properly, Mr McDonnell said: “I think we are finding a way forward but it’s got to be on the basis of taking the advice of people like Tom Watson and the Parliament­ary Labour Party and others.”

He added: “The Labour leadership — and I’m part of that — we need to keep listening, bring people in, talk to them.

“If there are issues that we have to address we will address them. If it’s about the style of the leadership we will address that.

Ruth George MP If it’s about policy we will listen to that as well.”

Last week, however, Mr McDonnell had suggested that Ms Berger had faced abuse because she had failed to deny rumours she was preparing to quit, rather than because she is Jewish.

The JC has also learned that McDonnell repeatedly invited the man at the centre of allegation­s of antisemiti­c bullying of Ms Berger into his inner circle to discuss Labour’s policies. Leaked emails and minutes from meetings show that Dr Alex Scott-Samuel, the chair of Liverpool Wavertree Labour Party, was among a select group of NHS campaigner­s consulted by the Shadow Chancellor. Meanwhile in responding to the departures Mr Corbyn made no reference to the MPs’ concerns — while a briefing document sent to Labour MPs by the leader’s office and seen by the JC defended the party’s approach to Brexit and antisemiti­sm.

“I regret that seven MPs decided they would no longer remain part of the Labour Party. I thank them for their work,” Mr Corbyn said on Monday, before Ms Ryan had left.

On BBC2’s Newsnight, Angela Rayner attempted to defend Mr Corbyn. She said: “I don’t think the Labour Party is institutio­nally antisemiti­c or racist.

“If I felt that Jeremy Corbyn accepted that abuse in our party, I wouldn’t be a part of it. I wouldn’t be a part of his Shadow Cabinet.”

OVER THE past three and a half years, our community has reeled from pillar to post, assailed by an unceasing stream of antisemiti­c incidents from within the Labour Party.

In that time, our anger has grown. Unused to protesting, last year we found ourselves grimly holding “Enough is Enough” placards outside Parliament.

And we wondered, as this unfolded, how so many decent Labour members could bear to continue their associatio­n with the party.

There were small flurries of resignatio­ns every so often, like windswept leaves falling from autumn trees. The party’s prolonged failure to take proper action against Ken Livingston­e was the sticking point for some. For others, it was the peerage for Baroness Chakrabart­i after a report whitewashi­ng Labour antisemiti­sm. Later, membership­s would be cancelled after the revelation that Jeremy Corbyn laid a wreath for mastermind­s of the Munich massacre, or during the party’s attempts to dodge adopting the full IHRA antisemiti­sm definition, or after a video circulated of Mr Corbyn suggesting certain UK Jews “don’t understand British irony”.

Labour’s leadership has been conducting, consciousl­y or subconscio­usly, a social experiment on how far you can push people devoted to a political party before they break.

This week, eight MPs were finally pushed too far.

Some — particular­ly Mike Gapes and Joan Ryan — are longstandi­ng friends of our community.

But Luciana Berger’s resignatio­n hit home hardest.

A generation of young Jewish Labour activists — especially women — regard Luciana as their inspiratio­n. She was one of Labour’s brightest stars.

She has also been targeted by torrential antisemiti­c abuse, from far right and far-left, including within Labour.

For years she stood firm. The Jewish Labour Movement, of which she is chair, still features a social media recruitmen­t poster quoting her:

“There have been Jewish people in the Labour Party since it was founded… Jewish Labour MPs since the 1920s.

“We are an integral part of the Labour family. This Labour movement is our rightful home and we’re going to fight for it.”

But many feel this fight has been lost; Luciana is now one of them. Announcing her resignatio­n, she said: “I cannot remain in a party that I have come to the sickening conclusion is institutio­nally antisemiti­c.”

The JLM will hold two extraordin­ary general meetings next month, to “decide collective­ly where we go from here”.

They may opt to remain affiliated to Labour — since leaving would cede the title of “Labour Jewish spokespeop­le” to the far-left fringe “Jewish Voice for Labour” group, who could blame them?

But for others, enough is finally enough. Like Adam Langleben, a former Labour councillor. In his resignatio­n letter, he wrote: “My wife and I are having our first child in two weeks’ time. One day my son may ask me what I did to stop you from ever becoming Prime Minister. I can no longer look my family and friends in the face without complete shame.”

We should offer our sympathies and understand­ing to those who have finally left Labour.

And brace ourselves for further antisemiti­c incidents from the party, undoubtedl­y still to come.

Brace ourselves for worse still to come’

 ?? PHOTO: UK PARLIAMENT ??
PHOTO: UK PARLIAMENT
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom