The Journal

Critics hit out over more delays to rail network

- JAMES ROBINSON Local democracy reporter james.robinson@reachplc.com

LEADING Labour figures in the North East have criticised the Government over delays to planned changes on the East Coast Mainline.

The controvers­ial changes would have seen a third fast service run between Newcastle and London every hour. However, the plans, which were due to be rolled out this December, would have meant less services stopping in Durham and Northumber­land due to a lack of capacity on the line due to tight constraint­s on the number of trains physically able to run on the line.

This week, rail chiefs have confirmed that the changes have been shelved due to the number of issues around the proposals. The Government has responded to criticism by arguing that rail operators are responsibl­e for rolling out any timetable changes.

Labour’s mayor candidate Kim McGuinness said: “It feels like every month we see a new railway failing from this Government. We have seen High Speed Rail - a new railway line to solve our capacity issues - scrapped. We’ve seen plans to reopen the Leamside line in Durham - helping us keep services going - announced and scrapped within 24 hours.

“Now, just a month after the budget promised railway investment, we’ve been warned the proposed changes would lead to cancellati­ons and delays. We always had concerns about the changes, they took away rather than added to the services, but now we are left with no changes at all and no increase in capacity.

“This Government has no plan for the railways, we urgently need change.” The leader of Gateshead Council, Martin Gannon, was briefed on the timetable u-turn on Monday as a member of the Rail North Committee. The Labour councillor blamed the Government’s long-term planning for the changes.

He said: “This shows conclusive­ly the urgent need to invest now to increase rail capacity in the North East. The country’s entire economy, and the main link between Edinburgh to London, is being constraine­d by the Government’s long-term planning failure.”

The Department for Transport (DfT) said it was “disappoint­ed” the proposals had been delayed. It added that the upgrade was not related to previous investment for infrastruc­ture on the route. A spokeswoma­n for the DfT said: “The need to defer the planned upgrade is not related to funding given we have invested £4bn in infrastruc­ture and new trains on this very route, but it is ultimately for industry to deliver timetable upgrades.

“While we’re disappoint­ed with the need to defer the full planned upgrade, we expect all industry partners to continue working on improvemen­ts as we seek to bolster transport more widely across the region - including by reopening the Northumber­land Line and redirectin­g HS2 funding to benefit more people in more places, more quickly.” It was also pointed out that the DfT have provided £350,000 to Transport North East in support of “their ongoing developmen­t of regional rail schemes, with the department pledging to support TNE on the Leamside Line.

Network Rail said there were “too many outstandin­g issues” to deliver the new timetable in December as planned, but that the company was “committed” to delivering benefits to both passengers and freight travel as soon as possible.

 ?? ?? > Kim McGuinness
> Kim McGuinness
 ?? ?? > The Government argues that timetable changes need to be rolled out by rail operators
> The Government argues that timetable changes need to be rolled out by rail operators

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom