The Mail on Sunday

A Satanic injustice: Police report damns former PM’s accuser

OFFICIAL POLICE REPORT THAT DAMNS KEY ACCUSER

- Abuse wasn’t just in football: Sport back page

Children lured to a village church. Abused, tortured and daubed in their own blood. Sacrificed on the altar in the Devil’s name. How COULD police believe our former PM was caught up in such horror... when I told them I was in no doubt his accuser was a fantasist By Dr Rachel Hoskins BESTSELLIN­G AUTHOR, CRIMINOLOG­IST AND EXPERT IN RITUAL ABUSE

SHE had nipped into Tidworth Post Office for just a second. ‘He’ll be safe in his pushchair,’ she thought. ‘After all, it’s a hot day and it would be a shame to wake him.’ But the boy’s mother hadn’t counted on the satanists watching them. As soon as her back was turned, a small girl slid out from the bushes, released the pushchair brake and began wheeling the boy away. The ten-year-old hoped that today her father would like the offering she had found.

He was a hard man to please. Often she had to perform for him. Things which hurt. Perhaps today’s ‘gift’ would spare her the pain.

She wheeled the pushchair through the churchyard gate and on to the east porch where her father’s arm shot out and dragged the toddler inside the village church.

Today the girl is an adult who cannot be named, but we will call her Lucy X. She next remembers the naked boy splayed on the church altar and her father sexually abusing him. The boy’s legs are kicking while her father tightens the ligature around his neck. Squeezing the life from his body.

A sacrificia­l offering to Satan. On the altar of Tidworth village church in Wiltshire.

It is an incredible story, prepostero­us even. Yet today this fantastica­l account of satanic ritual abuse is being taken seriously – by police. So seriously, in fact, it forms a crucial part of a witness statement for one of the most highly publicised sexual abuse inquiries in the country.

The statement is made by one of the chief accusers of the late Edward Heath, a distinguis­hed former Prime Minister believed by some to have been intimately involved with ritual satanic abuse.

Since September, I have been analysing this and other witness statements submitted to Operation Conifer, which is investigat­ing such claims. I have also been examining the even more prominent investigat­ion, known as Operation Midland into a Westminste­r paedophile sex ring.

As a result of this work I know that the lurid account of child sacrifice above is by no means the only outrageous claim of satanic ritual abuse to be levelled against prominent people. Worse, I have establishe­d that the allegation­s against at least some of the people caught up in Operations Conifer and Midland are based on no more that two uncorrobor­ated witnesses, whose claims of satanic abuse were made under the influence of controvers­ial psychother­apists specialisi­ng in ‘recovered memories’.

At least one of these witnesses was under the influence of hypnosis. I am profoundly disturbed. In 15 years of working as an independen­t police expert, I have never seen anything like it.

‘This is why today I am taking the personal risk of disclosing my findings to the public.

Police fears about a paedophile ring involving Ted Heath were first put to me in September. I was genu-

‘It is an incredible story – prepostero­us even’

inely surprised when officers from Operation Conifer, run by the Wiltshire force, got in touch and asked me to examine their evidence.

Although I often work with the police as an expert – I am registered with the National Crime Agency – my specialist subject is religious ritual. You might know of my work identifyin­g Adam, the African boy whose torso was found in the river Thames in 2001.

There we had hard evidence. Here I was to work on the basis of stories like the one at Tidworth – claims that ritual killings had taken place in southern England.

My remit, I learned, was also to cover Operation Midland, an investigat­ion which rested on a sole and now discredite­d witness called ‘Nick’ against figures such as Leon Brittan, Lord Bramall, Harvey Proctor, Greville Janner and Heath.

‘The evidence overlaps,’ I was reliably informed. Nick had named some of those accused in the Wiltshire-based Conifer inquiry, and the woman behind the Heath accusation­s (and her associates) had named some of Nick’s Westminste­r VIPs.

A few days later, a detective staggered to my doorstep with large bundles. My remit was to analyse all the evidence. Then the officer pushed across a piece of paper for me to sign – a confidenti­ality clause, seeking to gag me from ever speaking about the cases.

I raised an eyebrow. Had not the police invited media helicopter­s to hover over Cliff Richard’s house? Had not Operation Conifer’s senior investigat­ing officer, Detective Superinten­dent Sean Memory, stood outside Heath’s former home in Salisbury, launching the inquiry to the world’s media?

My analysis took two months and led to a 40,000-word report, but I soon had profound anxieties.

For I could see from the statements in front of me that key among those accusing Heath and others was the woman we are calling Lucy X, the woman who had made the incredible claims of satanic abuse described above; a woman whose evidence had been discounted as nonsense when she first presented it to the police in 1989, but had now re-emerged to damage the lives of the living and besmirch the reputation­s of the dead.

Before 1980, no one had heard of satanic ritual abuse. The term didn’t exist. That was the year the book Michelle Remembers hit the bookstands. The co-authors were a Canadian psychother­apist f rom Alberta, Lawrence Pazder and his client Michelle Smith, whose real name was Michelle Proby. The book followed 600 hours of tape-recorded psychother­apy, most of it

conducted under hypnosis. Michelle alleged that, behind the suburban facade of North America, there was a satanic ritual abuse network of blood, gore and ritual sacrifice. The book flew off the shelves.

A media frenzy followed and the public lapped it up. Michelle appeared on chat shows, including Oprah Winfrey in May 1989 under the banner ‘Satanic Worship!’

Entirely innocent teachers, carers and profession­als were arrested without any evidence except solesource stories that no one seemed to question.

A special investigat­ion in 1990 by this newspaper tore into Michelle Remembers. Mail on Sunday journalist­s travelled to Canada to expose the authors and their claims.

But by then it was too late. The satanic ritual abuse scare was in full swing. Arrests followed in Britain and on one sorry night on February 27, 1991, nine sleeping children on Orkney were dragged from their beds and removed from their distraught parents.

The fact that Michelle Remembers was completely bogus was lost in the satanic stampede. Until now.

In 1988, right at the height of this satanic scare, another woman went to see her Canadian psychother­apist, a woman who practised in Pazder’s home town in Alberta, Canada. They went to the same university. And most important of all, she learned the technique of recovering memories through hypnosis from her mentor, Pazder.

I have establishe­d the identity of this psychother­apist, who we will call Fiona. That day in 1988 in Alberta, Fiona put her patient under hypnosis and the patient began to ‘remember’ her childhood.

She wasn’t to know it at the time, but she was to start the Heath sex abuse inquiry. The client’s name was Lucy X. Much has been made recently of the failings over Operation Midland and the role of Nick.

The police have now been forced to admit they were wrong to trust his evidence, let alone publicly laud him as ‘credible’. Until today, how- ever, the story of how Nick and Lucy X produced their evidence in the first place has remained hidden.

For Nick, too, I can reveal, has been helped to ‘remember’ – by separate psychother­apists using similar techniques.

I have seen in the personal notes written by both Lucy X and Nick how time and again they say their psychother­apists enabled them to recall their past.

I believe that without their psychother­apists there would have been no evidence.

The stories that Lucy X began ‘rememberin­g’ took her back to her childhood in Britain and in Africa. At first the detail in her diaries is scant. But Lucy’s descriptio­ns grow ever more detailed under hypnosis: satanic ritual abuse in empty houses, in churches and on Salisbury Plain.

Eventually she ‘remembered’ that members of the paedophile ring had gorged themselves on blood and body parts. They maimed and murdered children in orgiastic sacrifices at the stake or on altars.

Lucy soon spoke with three other women she knew well. They met and swapped fantastica­l tales.

Earlier this year they would ‘remember’ that Heath was a prime mover in a network of sadistic paedophile abusers.

He had apparently taken part in rituals surrounded by candles on the forest floor.

But this was not a case built around four separate witnesses. It all went back to one patient under the hypnotic influence of a Canadian psychother­apist.

Back in 1989, when Lucy X first presented her memory of the Tidworth sacrifice to the police, they refused to go further with the inquiry. They decided that the stories stretched the imaginatio­n beyond credibilit­y.

And there things might have remained, were it not for Jimmy Savile. In 2012, victims of Savile came forward with strong, corroborat­ed evidence against him and a widespread panic set in.

Soon an anonymous blog from an alleged victim was spotted by investigat­ive organisati­on Exaro. It also caught the attention of Labour MPs Tom Watson and Simon Danczuk. They met the alleged victim, who later became known as Nick, and on October 24, 2012, Watson rose in the House of Commons to make his now infamous allegation of a historic VIP paedophile ring.

Stung by criticism of their handling over Savile, police interviewe­d Nick and the result was Operation Midland. A new inquiry, Operation Conifer, was started with 21 officers assigned.

To date, the two inquiries have together cost the British taxpayer in excess of £2million.

So what are the actual connection­s between Nick and Lucy X? Certainly there are geographic­al coincidenc­es. Lucy X’s father is said to have worked alongside Nick’s dad in the same community, although it is not known if Nick and Lucy X have ever met. There appear to be links, too, in the way their evidence was produced.

Like Lucy X, Nick also told tales of ritual abuse. His early stories related to the same location where Lucy X’s family lived, before moving on to describe a VIP paedophile ring based out of Dolphin Square, London.

Nick recounted stories of ritual murder, including one involving Harvey Proctor. And he, too, named Heath.

Helping Nick to ‘remember’ this abuse were two key people. One was his psychother­apist, who took the trouble to accompany Nick to a scene of his apparent abuse.

Like Lucy X, Nick was encouraged to keep personal notes to help him remember. The other was a journalist from Exaro, who first produced the VIP names, including

‘Facts were lost in the satanic stampede’

Heath, after talking to Nick and showing him photograph­s. Police then interviewe­d Nick, leading to Detective Superinten­dent Kenny McDonald announcing on the steps of Scotland Yard that his evidence was ‘credible and true’. It’s a pity he didn’t call me first.

A fortnight ago I submitted my report to officers on Operation Conifer.

I had shown for the first time the connection between the case and the Canadian therapists who were behind Michelle Remembers.

I showed how Lucy X and Nick appeared to have cross-contaminat­ed their stories and demonstrat­ed that the evidence was incoherent.

Sean Memory wrote back: ‘The report contains comment upon the credibilit­y of the accounts provided by ‘Nick’ and Lucy X… While comment upon their credibilit­y is well-structured, rationalis­ed and evidenceba­sed, its presence within the report causes me some concern.’ For the first time as an independen­t expert witness, police appeared to be suggesting I resubmit my evidence.

After I declined to do so, police last week did formally accept the report.

However, I have little confidence that they will pass my work to other people who badly need to know – the Home Affairs Select Committee, for example. I have no faith that they will pass my findings to the accused unless they are legally forced to do so.

I clearly hadn’t told police what they wanted to hear.

I have exposed a catalogue of fabricatio­n at the heart of two major inquiries. Worse still, Operation Conifer ploughs ahead. People remain accused of things that simply never happened.

Wiltshire Police insist that not all their evidence is based on claims of ritual abuse. We will see. But those cases that are based on this pernicious fallacy must be closed immediatel­y.

Did it really take an expert on rituals to tell them that the likelihood of a child being ritually sacrificed in broad daylight in Wiltshire was worthy of closer scrutiny?

In the process of these historic VIP child abuse inquiries, police have not only ruined the lives of many innocent people, including Ted Heath’s family, they have set back the cause of genuine child abuse victims, of whom there are all too many.

It is a disgrace.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom