The Mail on Sunday

FOOTBALL FACES THE BIGGEST CRISIS IN ITS HISTORY... AND WHAT HAVE THE FA DONE? SET UP A HOTLINE

What a sad, sick metaphor for our image-obsessed game that the governing body have spent more time talking about drinks at a wedding than this scandal of abuse

-

HOUR by hour and day by day, English football is sinking lower and lower into a deep, dark pit. Every television bulletin, every newspaper edition, every press of the refresh button brings forth an horrific story of a boy who dreamed of being a footballer and whose life was ruined. A dam has burst and a mighty torrent of despair is pouring through it.

And the Football Associatio­n have set up a helpline. And the FA chairman, Greg Clarke, when he was asked if the FA had let down the victims, said: ‘I don’t believe so.’

And Crewe Alexandra, the club where Barry Bennell was left to indulge his voracious appetite for children for year after terrifying year, squirms and dissembles and wriggles and hides.

And a couple of decades too late, it announces ‘an independen­t review of the way the club dealt with historical child abuse allegation­s’, cravenly allowing its senior officials to remain in their posts.

And Dario Gradi, the mastermind of Crewe’s much-vaunted youth system for 30 years and still the club’s director of football, says the chairman has told him to ‘keep out of it’.

Ah, yes. Keep out of it. Football’s mantra when it comes to secrets like this. The FA did that back in the day. When the investigat­ive reporter Deborah Davies approached the FA’s then director of coaching and education, Charles Hughes, outside Lancaster Gate in 1996 and asked whether his organisati­on should bring in rules to protect children, he walked past her as if she wasn’t there. ‘I don’t believe so’ sounds rather empty doesn’t it?

Maybe football still wants to keep out of it. Let’s be honest about this: its response to the heart-breaking revelation­s of widespread sexual abuse in the English game in the Eighties and Nineties made by Andy Woodward, Paul Stewart, David White and others in the last 10 days has been tepid.

A helpline is a good idea but it is less than the absolute bare minimum expected of the FA. It is like trying to apply a sticking plaster to a gaping exit wound.

Why hasn’t it begun an immediate investigat­ion into Crewe? Maybe because it would have to take a long hard look at itself as well?

Do they not appreciate what is happening here? The events of the last 10 days are plunging the English game into one of the worst crises in its history. It is beginning to seem as if football betrayed a generation of players by looking the other way as monsters roamed free. The game will not escape the past this time. The past has caught up with it now and it will have its vengeance and it will get its justice.

There will be criminal charges. Teams will face punitive and sweeping claims for compensati­on. Clubs with proud histories and loyal fans, clubs who have clung to survival for years, may go to the wall over this. The landscape of the game will change.

Why aren’t more people in football angry about what was allowed to happen? Why can’t the FA grasp what is happening here? They spent more time pontificat­ing about Wayne Rooney having a few drinks at a wedding party than they have spent talking about sexual abuse that went unchecked in the sport they are supposed to govern.

What a sad, sick metaphor for our image-obsessed game.

The FA’s chief executive Martin Glenn was all over the wedding party issue. It didn’t set a great tone, he said, of the pictures of Rooney at The Grove. Well, forgive me, but brave, brave ex-footballer­s reliving stories of shattered lives in print and on television, choking back tears, doesn’t set a great tone, either. The FA need to get out there and show some leadership.

FOOTBALL is not doing enough. Nowhere near enough. Where is the rage that the scale of abuse was hushed up? Why are men like Clarke not holding up their hands and saying that, of course, the FA bear some responsibi­lity for what happened?

Let’s get real about this: English football protected Bennell. Looking the other way. Several of his victims have already said that. A Crewe director has appeared to confirm it. Football indulged Bennell in the same way the BBC never chose to confront Jimmy Savile. And football has never paid the price for what it did. Sure, after Bennell was convicted in 1998 and sent to jail for nine years, football took steps to try to make sure a man like him could never spread his evil in the game again. But it never called the other guilty men to account. It never dealt with those who turned a blind eye.

Football never dealt with those who moved Bennell on, allowing him to wreak more havoc on innocent lives, rather than face the embarrassm­ent and the collateral damage of admitting that he had been allowed to flourish at their club. Many clubs have questions to answer. Many more are set to be implicated.

Yesterday, there were claims that some teams had bought off the families of victims in order to hush up abuse and protect their image.

Hampshire Police have opened an investigat­ion into abuse at clubs in their area. The same with the Metropolit­an Police. And Northumbri­a Police. And Cheshire Police. Given that Crewe have more questions to answer than any other club, their reaction so far has been desultory. They have fallen somewhere between utterly disrespect­ful to their former players and downright disgusting.

First of all, Crewe tried to put up a wall. They said ‘No comment’. They said they would see how things ‘unravelled’. When things did indeed unravel, their responses, including those of Gradi, were so begrudging they verged on delusional.

The FA should already be calling Crewe to account. Everyone at the club should be begging forgivenes­s for what happened. They should also be expecting to be hit with severe sanctions for Bennell’s actions.

THEIR fans may suffer because of the inaction of those who should have known better. The club’s future is uncertain. These might be historic crimes but some of the men in senior positions when Bennell was operating out of Crewe are still there.

They should not be there for much longer. They should be scribbling out letters of resignatio­n as fast as they can and seeing if they can submit them before they get fired or charged by the FA. Then they should await the rest of the consequenc­es.

This is not a club who have failed to register a player for a cup replay. This is a club where an employee ruined the lives of countless young players in their care. This is a club where an employee launched a sexual attack on a child. This is a club that presided over one of the most despicable episodes in the history of English football. The idea that they should escape scrutiny and punishment for that is absurd.

Hamilton Smith, who served on the Crewe board from 1986 to early 1990, said that, even after concerns had been raised about Bennell at a high level of the club, Gradi made it clear he did not have any problem with Bennell and he stayed on at the club for a number of years.

In a 1996 Dispatches documentar­y, Gradi said there was ‘never any cause for concern’ about boys staying at the house of the youthteam coach. That was a disastrous misjudgmen­t.

The past is another country but Woodward, Stewart, White and others marched English football back across its border last week and led it to some of its darkest valleys to show it where the secrets dwelled. As new horrors emerge, it feels as if it is an awful long way back to the light.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? BRAVE ACT: Woodward spoke out about the abuse he suffered while at Crewe
BRAVE ACT: Woodward spoke out about the abuse he suffered while at Crewe

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom