The Mail on Sunday

Save Britain from the bloodsucki­ng lawyers

-

LAST week we learned that ambulance-chasing ‘no win, no fee’ lawyers are sucking £440million out of the NHS every year. That’s just their share of the loot. Lawsuits in total cost the Health Service more than £1.5billion a year.

Any visitor to NHS hospitals knows that these cynical firms are allowed to advertise their ‘services’ in the public areas of hospitals themselves. In effect, the NHS has to help people to ruin it.

There is no need for any of this. It all stems from a crazy mistake made back in the 1990s by Margaret Thatcher and John Major.

Almost everyone who understood the subject was against introducin­g no win, no fee lawsuits at the time, including senior judges and distinguis­hed lawyers.

They warned that it would ‘Americanis­e’ our legal system. And they were dead right. I can remember, as long ago as 1982, watching Paul Newman playing a deadbeat US lawyer in The Verdict.

The opening scene showed Newman hanging round funeral parlours, wretchedly handing his business card to the mourners of accident victims, in the hope of getting a case, any case.

At the time, I had no idea this went on. Later, during many visits to the US and while living there in the early 1990s, I discovered the hideous truth. Nobody, anywhere, was safe from a mad lawsuit which might well succeed.

I was warned, for instance, that if a guest in my house merely spilled hot water on himself, I could well face a gigantic lawsuit and lose it.

From this came the cringing, hyper-cautious ‘health and safety’ culture which dogs the supposed land of the free (and now dogs us too). Not to mention much higher costs for almost everything, as insurers raise their premiums to finance the incessant, huge payments.

Who, knowing this, would intro- duce this Bloodsucke­rs’ Charter in a country that didn’t have it? We did. A Royal commission had opposed it. The Law Commission didn’t like it.

It was excoriated by experts and laymen alike in the House of Lords, where it was attacked by the late Lord Rawlinson for introducin­g ‘ambulance-chasing’ in which lawyers acted ‘like vultures’.

But Mrs Thatcher went gaily ahead with this Bloodsucke­rs’ Charter, more politely known as the 1990 Courts And Legal Services Act (Section 58).

This cleared the way for the change, but was fitted with a timedelay device – perhaps because the Government was ashamed of it and didn’t want to be linked with it when it eventually took effect.

IT WAS finally activated in 1995 by the passage of the Conditiona­l Fee Agreements Regulation­s. In a last-ditch attempt to stop it, which failed by only six votes, the late Lord Ackner warned ‘there will be occasions when this country will exceed the worst excesses of the United States’.

He noted that the original Bill had been ‘enacted in the teeth of opposition from seven Law Lords, the Master of the Rolls, a former Lord Chancellor, my noble and learned friend Lord Hailsham, a former Attorney-General, the noble and learned lord, Lord Rawlinson of Ewell and the Law Commission’.

The clear reason for the measure was to save money on legal aid, which is of course a very costly way of trying to see that justice is open to those who are not rich. But, as we now see, it was a false economy. The NHS’s annual legal bill of £1.5billion is only slightly less than the £1.7billion which legal aid cost the whole country in 2014-15.

And that is just the NHS. Who can count the extra costs loaded on to every other public body, from schools to the Army, and on to every private company, by the need to guard against opportunis­t lawyers scouring the country for plaintiffs seeking a payout?

In the catalogue of mistakes made by government­s, this is a pretty big one. But it is also quite easy to put right. Who would weep, apart from the legal vultures, if we abolished no win, no fee and went back to legal aid for reasonable cases? It would obviously cost less in the long run.

My guess is that nothing happens because most people still blame the loopy ‘Health and Safety’ culture, wrongly, on human rights laws or political correctnes­s. It has nothing to do with them. It can’t even be blamed on Anthony Blair, who was indeed a disaster but didn’t wreck the country all by himself. It was just a stupid mistake. Theresa May has the sense to reverse it, and should do so.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? LEGAL VULTURE: Paul Newman playing an ambulance-chasing lawyer in the 1982 film The Verdict
LEGAL VULTURE: Paul Newman playing an ambulance-chasing lawyer in the 1982 film The Verdict

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom