The Mail on Sunday

Insurers’ profits sink after compensati­on shock

The investment column that makes the most of your money

- By Alex Hawkes

MAJOR insurers are this week expected to flag up price hikes for customers in the wake of a shock Government move on compensati­on payments for people involved in life-changing accidents. Admiral and Direct Line both report full-year numbers this week, with the industry reeling from the Government’s decision last month to slash the Ogden rate used to calculate insurers’ compensati­on payments, which are designed to support victims for the rest of their lives. The Ogden rate is the rate of investment return those receiving compensati­on payments are expected to earn. It is set by the Justice Secretary Liz Truss, and last month she slashed it from 2.5 per cent to minus 0.75 per cent.

The cut means insurers will have to make bigger upfront compensati­on payments.

PwC has said car insurance premiums will rise more than 10 per cent, or £50 to £75 on average, to meet the cost.

Evidence of rising insurance costs will heap further pressure on Chancellor Philip Hammond to intervene in his Budget on Wednesday.

The same day, Admiral will say 2016 profits were £286million, down from £369million in 2015, said analysts at investment bank Berenberg. Admiral has said the Ogden change could cost it £175million over five years.

Meanwhile, Direct Line will say on Tuesday that 2016 profits fell to £288million from £508million in 2015. It believes the compensati­on change will knock 2016 profits by up to £230million.

Investment bank UBS said that car insurance is rising at 5 per cent a year. On top, the pound’s fall is driving up the cost of replacemen­t parts and with the Ogden changes, that could imply 20 per cent price rises. ‘It is unlikely companies will be able to entirely pass this on without losing market share,’ the bank said in a note.

INSURERS were dismayed last week after the Government announced a change in the way compensati­on payments should be calculated in life-changing personal injury claims. The precise repercussi­ons are yet to be revealed, but analysts suggest the move could boost payouts by at least 80 per cent over time.

Amid much wailing and gnashing of teeth from the insurance industry, one firm is expected to benefit from the change – Frenkel Topping, a small, oddlynamed business that specialise­s in managing money for victims of catastroph­ic accidents.

Frenkel shares are 61½p and should increase materially over the next few years, not only in response to changes in compensati­on payments but also because the group is in the throes of a transforma­tion under chairman Jason Granite.

Frenkel Topping was founded in 1980 by two accountant­s, Michael Topping and John Frenkel. Their names live on but they have not been involved in the business for years. The company floated in 2004 and built a reputation for advising victims of life-changing incidents and their families.

Then, at the end of 2015, Granite arrived. A former investment banker, turnaround specialist and hedge fund owner, Granite now runs a private investment firm, FCFM, where billionair­e businessma­n Michael Spencer is the second-largest shareholde­r.

Spotting potential at Frenkel Topping, Granite and Spencer have acquired more than 17 per cent of the shares, while Granite has initiated several significan­t changes at the company, designed to help customers and boost the bottom line.

Most importantl­y, the group has begun to manage customers’ money, rather than just advise them on what to do with it. This has three implicatio­ns. First, customers now have to pay considerab­ly less to have their money managed than they did when it was handled by external investment managers. Second, Frenkel Topping focuses exclusivel­y on helping the victims of tragic accidents, so it is best placed to manage their cash in a way that ensures they have the annual funds they need to make the best of their lives. Third, bringing fund management in-house boosts its profits. Results for 2016 will be announced in a couple of weeks and are expected to show profits of £1.5million with a dividend of 1.1p. In the current year however, profits of at least £3.4million are expected, with more than £4million pencilled in for 2018. Both these figures were revised upwards last week, following the compensati­on ruling – and dividends, currently expected at 1.3p this year and 1.6p next, may increase as well. Each year, about £2billion is paid out to the victims of catastroph­ic injuries – caused by medical negligence or accidents. In each case, the lives of victims and their families are changed forever and compensati­on is vital to support them and finance everything from carers to stairlifts to special education.

Following the compensati­on ruling, the sums are expected to rise to between £3 billion and £4billion annually.

Frenkel currently has around 1,000 clients, whose assets amount to about £750 million. This year, it is likely to gain about 100 new customers, whose awards were expected to average £750,000 but may be nearer £1,000,000 now.

And, while insurers bemoan the change in the law, Granite points out that, for victims of accidents – left paraplegic, brain damaged or similarly afflicted – the recent ruling means that they will now receive the compensati­on they deserve which can make a meaningful difference to their quality of life.

Midas verdict: Jason Granite may not seem the typical chairman of a small company like Frenkel Topping, which focuses on helping vulnerable people make the best of tragic situations and has historical­ly been viewed as rather sleepy. But he is determined to improve customers’ lives and shareholde­r returns, and seems eminently capable of both.

The shares rose after last week’s ruling but, at 61½p, there is still plenty of potential.

 ??  ?? ALL AT SEA: Admiral could lose £175million
ALL AT SEA: Admiral could lose £175million
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? POTENTIAL: Billionair­e Michael Spencer is a key investor in adviser Frenkel Topping
POTENTIAL: Billionair­e Michael Spencer is a key investor in adviser Frenkel Topping
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom