The Mail on Sunday

Chancellor... you made a huge mistake

- by Jeff Prestridge PERSONAL FINANCE EDITOR

UNINTENDED consequenc­es syndrome. It is a regular trap Chancellor­s fall into on Budget Day. Declaring tax increases, that is, which sound sensible in the comfy surroundin­gs of the Treasury’s offices on Whitehall, but if implemente­d cause untold damage to the economy.

Gordon Brown’s move in 1997 to abolish the tax credits pension funds enjoyed on dividends is a classic case. At the time he heralded it as a smart move, sucking £5billion a year from work-based pension schemes into the Treasury’s coffers. Schemes designed to provide workers with half-decent pensions that would negate their need in retirement to turn to the State for a panoply of meansteste­d benefits.

But of course Brown’s tax grab – now estimated to rake in £10billion a year – has proved disastrous, reducing many defined benefit pension schemes (deluxe arrangemen­ts) to a shadow of their former selves.

Most are now underwater (with pension deficits the depth of the Mariana Trench), nearly all are shut to new workers or further contributi­ons, while many have been unable to pay the pensions promised. A majority face an uncertain future, which is a great worry to workers who are relying on such a pension to see them through retirement.

Brown destroyed the defined benefit works pension scheme, leaving defined benefit arrangemen­ts the preserve of public sector workers (Treasury boffins and MPs).

Was it worth the £5billion a year tax grab? Of course not. Sadly, Philip Hammond has just committed a similar taxation sin with his proposed tax raid on the self-employed from April next year.

Like Brown, Hammond carried out this financial harming act in his debut Budget. Unlike the Labour Chancellor, he has the chance to backtrack before legislatio­n is put before the Commons for approval. He should grab it.

Although Hammond’s tax raid has been defended by some, it is wrong on so many levels. For a start, it breaks a Conservati­ve manifesto pledge not to hike up National Insurance contributi­ons. A pledge should be rock solid. Breaking it undermines the Government’s integrity.

Secondly, it represents a taxation assault on many people who are ‘just about managing’ – the citizens that Prime Minister Theresa May has pledged to help.

But most crucially, it is an attack on the self-employed and entreprene­urship – risk-takers who are now the heartbeat of the economy and whom a Conservati­ve Government should be backing to the hilt. As we move closer to ‘Brexit’ there is no doubt that uncertaint­y over the economy’s strength will pick up. Indeed, the Government’s own forecasts indicate that the economy will slow down next year. Inflation, aggravated by a weak pound, is also eating away at household finances.

Hammond should be doing his utmost to encourage and support the five million self-employed so they can continue to contribute to the economy’s wealth.

Raising National Insurance contributi­on rates is a tax on enterprise. Admit you made a mistake Mr Hammond, and abandon the hike. Don’t set in train another case of unintended consequenc­es syndrome.

As we move closer to Brexit, Hammond should be backing the self-employed to the absolute hilt

 ??  ?? P
P

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom