The Mail on Sunday

De Villiers ball-tampering row as hero Wood seals series win

- By Lawrence Booth

AB de VILLIERS reacted angrily after becoming embroiled in a ball-tampering row with the umpires during the second one-day internatio­nal in Southampto­n.

A brilliant last over from Mark Wood, which only conceded four runs with South Africa needing seven to win, saw England win the match by two runs and establish an unassailab­le 2-0 series lead.

However, Rob Bailey and Chris Gaffaney spoke to the South African captain after 33 overs of the England innings, believing that one of the two balls now used in each one-day internatio­nal innings was showing more wear and tear than the other.

The ball wasn’t changed, because the officials had no evidence of any wrongdoing. But according to playing regulation­s they were in their rights to speak to De Villiers

on the basis of a suspicion. De Villiers vehemently protested his side’s innocence, blaming a poorly manufactur­ed ball for the damage.

‘The umpires felt the condition of the ball changed, making me feel we were responsibl­e as a team,’ he said. ‘Nothing happened. I honestly told the umpires we had nothing to do with the condition of the ball, except that [Keshav] Maharaj had bowled five overs on the trot from that end, and the ball generally scuffs up when the spinner bowls.’

Asked if he felt the umpires were accusing his side of tampering, De Villiers replied: ‘Yes, I did feel that. I expressed that I was quite upset about it.

‘I felt it was a bad ball. That happens sometimes — the leather comes off. Unfortunat­ely, the umpires didn’t agree with that. Generally there’s a warning or a fine, but nothing happened and that tells me they realised we were innocent in this case.’

Law 42.3 says a change must be made ‘if the umpires together agree that the deteriorat­ion in the condition of the ball is greater than is consistent with the use it has received’.

For a while, it was unclear why the umpires had raised the state of the ball without taking further action. But they needed evidence of skuldugger­y, and evidently had none.

England captain Eoin Morgan said that the LED advertisin­g hoardings can cause the ball to scuff up.

South Africa’s sensitivit­y is understand­able. Back in November, Faf du Plessis was fined his match fee after using mint-enhanceded saliva to shine the ball during a Test against Australia. And in 2013, he pleaded guilty to rubbing the ball against the zip of his trouser pocket during a Test against Pakistan, and was fined 50 per cent of his fee.

 ??  ?? ON THE BALL: Umpires Rob Bailey and Chris Gaffaney speak to the South African captain AB dde Villiers about the state of the match ball duduring yesterday’s one-day internatio­nal
ON THE BALL: Umpires Rob Bailey and Chris Gaffaney speak to the South African captain AB dde Villiers about the state of the match ball duduring yesterday’s one-day internatio­nal

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom