The Mail on Sunday

Amazon’s U-turn over 90-day limit on fakes

Probes a world of scams and scandals

- by Tony Hetheringt­on

C.C. writes: Consumers should be warned that if buying through Amazon Marketplac­e, you lose credit card protection. This is because it is not the seller of the goods, even though it is Amazon’s name on the invoice. It deducts commission and pays the balance to the actual seller. I got caught out with my purchase of a computer hard drive costing £164. I later needed to return it to the manufactur­er under warranty, but it turned out to be counterfei­t. Amazon was sympatheti­c, though the bottom line is that it made money out of the sale of counterfei­t goods. BY ALL appearance­s, what you got for your money was a genuine 4TB hard drive manufactur­ed by the perfectly reputable company Western Digital. There was no way to tell that it was a fake until it went wrong and you needed to invoke the warranty – which was supposed to protect you for up to five years.

You complained to the seller but got no reply. When you complained to Amazon it told you: ‘You can file a claim under our A-to-Z safe buying guarantee up to 90 days after the order date if you provided payment to the seller via Amazon Marketplac­e, but the seller failed to deliver the item.’

You could also claim under the guarantee scheme if you received the item ‘but it was materially different than depicted in the seller’s descriptio­n.’ Finally, you were protected if the item was defective ‘and you notified the seller within 30 days of receipt’.

Then came the sting in the tail. Amazon said that as your purchase was more than 90 days earlier, ‘ these conditions have expired’. With no sense of irony, the writer added: ‘I hope this helps. We look forward to seeing you again soon.’

You asked me: ‘How would anyone spot a well counterfei­ted product?’ The 90-day time limit was a loophole that made Amazon’s guarantee worthless.

As I only recently took up a complaint with Amazon Marketplac­e when a reader who paid £ 259 for an iPad received only a cheap piece of plastic, I went back to the company. I asked how your experience squared with the guarantee it offered.

The result was quick – and remarkable. Twenty-four hours later, you received an email from Amazon. Almost as if nothing had happened and you had not already been turned down for a refund, the email apologised for the difficulti­es with your purchase and assured you that full reimbursem­ent had now been made to your credit card.

Amazon has given me a longwinded statement explaining what it does to combat fake goods and remove crooked sellers from Amazon Marketplac­e.

But from the point of view of con- sumers, the key passage says: ‘Customers are always protected by our A- to- Z guarantee, whether they make a purchase from Amazon or a third-party seller. If the product does not arrive or is not as advertised, customers can contact our customer support for a full refund of their order.’ Interestin­gly, there is no mention of a 90-day time limit, so perhaps Amazon has taken on board that spotting a fake is far from easy until it goes wrong.

 ??  ?? Dodgy Amazon dealer picked the wrong man RESPONSE: Amazon offered a full refund on the counterfei­t goods. Right: Our story two weeks ago on the fake iPad deal
Dodgy Amazon dealer picked the wrong man RESPONSE: Amazon offered a full refund on the counterfei­t goods. Right: Our story two weeks ago on the fake iPad deal

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom