The Mail on Sunday

Why Mrs May must tell MPs: Support my deal – or I quit

-

THERESA May’s resilience is her greatest strength. Her capacity t o plough doggedly onward i n the face of adversity makes Lazarus l ook l i ke a member of the Worried Well. But this morning that same steadfastn­ess is threatenin­g to destroy her premiershi­p.

‘This second vote stuff is killing her,’ a senior Cabinet Minister admitted to me, in reference to the widely held belief that, if the Prime Minister loses the Brexit vote on December 11, she will simply shrug it off, wring a few concession­s from Brussels, then return to the House of Commons for another go.

‘Downing Street’s strategy is to win it using VAR,’ an MP claimed, alluding to the controvers­ial video system that allowed World Cup referees to change their decisions after a second look.

But that’s actually the opposite of No 10’s strategy.

Its plan has been to make the vote in nine days’ time the moment of decision. To instil in wavering backbenche­rs and vacillatin­g Ministers a recognitio­n that they finally have nowhere to hide – it is Her Deal, No Deal or No Brexit.

But instead of recognisin­g it as a time for choosing, many MPs are approachin­g the historic division like it’s a dress-rehearsal. ‘I’ll probably vote for her eventually,’ a normally rock-solid loyalist told me, ‘but I’m not sure I can back Chequers first time round.’

Where Mrs May hoped Britain’s parliament­arians would view her deal through the prism of the national interest they are – to their eternal discredit – seizing the chance for some expedient lastminute politickin­g.

On the first vote they intend to express crowd-pleasing displeasur­e at the Prime Minister’s imperfect compact with the EU.

SECOND time round they will – grudgingly – vote for the devil they know, cl ai ming t o be safe - guarding Britain from the perils of a cliff-edge Brexit or a complete Brexit reversal.

Those charged with steering Mrs May’s deal through the Commons are alive to the havoc this narrative is creating. Chief Whip Julian Smith has told May he believes the idea of holding a second vote is ‘ nuts’. ‘Julian thinks we have to have a definitive result first time around,’ a friend says.

May’s team are equally conscious of the danger. ‘ If people think they can vote this down without consequenc­es they are mistaken,’ a senior aide warned. ‘If we lose the vote we’re entering uncharted territory’.

In fact, Smith and Team May are wrong. The idea of a second vote is not merely ‘ nuts’, nor does it simply cast the Government and country adrift in pilotless waters. It represents the most boneheaded act of denial ever indulged in by Britain’s political class.

There is no prospect – none at all – of the EU giving significan­t new concession­s in the face of a rejection by Parliament. We know this because everyone from Donald Tusk to JeanClaude Juncker has told us so. Even if the EU bureaucrat­s were for some inexplicab­le reason minded to bow to the wishes of a rebellious Commons, the EU heads of state would soon bring them to heel.

Merkel, Macron and Pedro Sánchez have their own domestic audiences. And they are not about to let German, French and Spanish voters see them getting pushed around by Jacob Rees-Mogg and ex-Brexit Minister Steve Baker.

There is also another major flaw with a scenario that envisages the British Prime Minister being despatched l i ke a modern- day Oliver Twist to beg the European Commission for more.

In the instant Mrs May loses the vote, she ceases to be Prime Minister. Her authority will be destroyed. The authority of her Government will be destroyed. Why would any European leader even bother to sit down with her when they know power no longer resides in Downing Street but in the offices of the Members for Uxbridge and South Ruislip and Leeds Central?

If Theresa May wants to stand any chance of prevailing in nine days’ time she has to kill off the idea that MPs will get a second chance. More specifical­ly, she has to stop doggedly ploughing on, and make one final, courageous stand.

She should issue a clear, unequivoca­l statement that she regards the vote on the 11th as a vote of confidence in her premiershi­p. If the Commons defeats her, she will step down, with all the consequenc­es that would bring.

Centrist Tory MPs need to know that a vote against her deal will plunge their party into chaos. That they will have ejected their own Prime Minister at a moment of national crisis, potentiall­y opening the door to the most rabidly Left-wing government in British political history.

Hardcore Tory Brexiteers need to know the days of using Mrs May as a human shield are over. That their bullish claims about being able to wrangle a tough new deal from Brussels are actually going to be put to the test, and that responsibi­lity for delivering the Brexit they promised the British people will finally rest with them.

AND Labour MPs need to know the time when they could define themselves purely by what they are against is also drawing to a close. If they wish to defy their leader – and his vicious acolytes – by driving through a second referendum, good luck to them.

If, as they claim, they have found an alternativ­e to No Deal they must explain what that deal is, and how it can command a parliament­ary majority. But above all, they and their parliament­ary colleagues have to realise that the votes they cast will have consequenc­es – for both the country and themselves.

But at the moment May is reluctant to force them to confront those consequenc­es. Her famous doggedness and sense of duty compel her to carry on regardless.

‘She won’t threaten to step down,’ an ally says, ‘not because she wants to cling to the job, but because she doesn’t think she can just walk away at a moment like this.’

Theresa May’s resilience has carried her through some desperate moments. But unless she finds a way to convince Parliament next week’s vote will have no action replay, it could also lead her to her most desperate defeat.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom