Now ‘snowf lake’ cops can opt out of training sessions with swear words
GOOD LUCK WHEN THIS HAPPENS. . .
FOR most police officers, facing a barrage of four- letter words from abusive suspects is an everyday occurrence.
But chiefs at one force are warning officers that they may be upset by ‘swearing’ and ‘offensive language’ in training exercises – and that they should contact their supervisor if they find it all too much.
The move – part of a trend for so-called trigger warnings normally associated with ‘snowflake’ university students – has been met with derision from hardbitten cops.
One officer joked on Twitter: ‘If this language is not acceptable to you please go directly to the safe space where the duty inspector will bring you a nice snuggle blanket and a cup of tea ... after that hand in your warrant card as you’re no ******* good to us.’
The language warning comes as part of an online exercise devised by Hampshire Police and aimed at both officers and civilian staff. Before a section on hate crime begins, an alert flashes up on screen saying: ‘Warning!’ in large letters.
It then says: ‘Please be aware that this package uses real life examples and, as a result, has offensive language and views in it.
‘Swear words are spelt out in full. Swear words are spoken in full in the audio files.
‘If you feel that this language is not acceptable to you, please close the package down and speak with your supervisor about how to proceed with completing the training.’
It is understood the warning was issued following a complaint by a distressed junior officer.
For some years, trigger warnings have been issued by universities to students who might encounter potentially offensive subject matter while studying subjects such as far Right groups and eating disorders.
Glasgow University theology students, for instance, were warned that they might see distressing images while studying the crucifixion of Jesus.
Boris Johnson has pledged to introduce an extra 20,000 officers over the next three years, but a recent Home Office report suggested forces were struggling to recruit because so many young people are ‘wrapped in cotton wool’ and unprepared for the harsh realities of the world.
The report, entitled the Front Line Review, said: ‘ Participants gave examples of recruitment interviews where candidates had stated they do not l i ke confrontation or were shocked by the need to work different shift patterns and possibilities of cancelled rest days.’
Frank Furedi, emeritus professor of sociology at the University of Kent, said: ‘This is very worrying. It is one thing for fragile 19-year-old sociology students to be easily offended, but when you have policemen and women maintaining law and order getting distressed by harsh language then you have a big problem.’
Hampshire police were approached for comment but did not reply.