The Mail on Sunday

THE BEST OF THIS WEEK’S POP AND CLASSICAL REVIEWS ARE ON

- DAVID MELLOR

Shostakovi­ch: Symphony No 11 ‘The Year 1905’

BBC Philharmon­ic, conducted by John Storgårds Chandos, out now

Shostakovi­ch’s 11th Symphony here receives a performanc­e of exceptiona­l eloquence from the Manchester-based BBC Philharmon­ic under their chief guest conductor, the Finn John Storgårds. The Chandos recording is typically vivid and wide-ranging, and this album surely goes to the top of the list for those wanting to acquaint themselves with one of Shostakovi­ch’s most mysterious utterances.

At one level, of course, the 11th, written in 1957, is anything but mysterious. Indeed, so accessible is it, it’s often thought of as a film score without the film. The symphony depicts events outside the Tsar’s Palace in January 1905 when a large and peaceful group of peasants – singing hymns and carrying pictures of the Tsar, to whom they were appealing for help – were cut down in substantia­l numbers by his soldiery. How this ‘Bloody Sunday’ style event was retold in the years immediatel­y after it, with inevitable exaggerati­ons about its scale, did much to undermine the Tsar’s standing, and precipitat­e the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917.

But what does this vividly memorable symphony actually mean? Is it a conformist piece of musical agitprop, full of revolution­ary songs? Or is it something very different? Is it, as many now suggest, Shostakovi­ch using a massacre of the innocents by a former Russian government to pass his own judgments on another Russian government brutally suppressin­g the Hungarian uprising of 1956? Shostakovi­ch is, of course, to echo Churchill’s saying about Russia itself, ‘A riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma.’ Persecuted to within an inch of his sanity and freedom by Stalin, Shostakovi­ch knew how to cover his tracks. On occasions, he was outwardly conformist and inwardly rebellious; he wrote music to be played immediatel­y, and other more profound stuff ‘for the drawer’, to be brought out only when it was safe to do so. Personally, I think Shostakovi­ch was so relieved at Khrushchev denouncing Stalin and all his works in 1956, he probably did think it was time to conform a bit. Many will strongly disagree. Anyway, what we are left with is a powerful statement, brilliantl­y orchestrat­ed, and, in its brazen, populist way, totally memorable. Whether you like it or not, this symphony is a remarkable piece; no mystery at all about that.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom