The Mail on Sunday

Defiant: The Untold Story Of The Battle Of Britain

- Simon Humphreys

Robert Verkaik

Robinson £20

This summer marks the 80th anniversar­y of the Battle of Britain. Most people will be familiar with the exploits of the Spitfires and the Hurricanes pitted against the enemy’s Messerschm­itts and Stukas; this book aims to resurrect the reputation of a third aircraft, the Boulton Paul Defiant.

It is a story of incompeten­ce, political machinatio­ns, military mismanagem­ent and top-brass ineptitude, but also one of outstandin­g bravery and sacrifice, an important contributi­on to the war effort that has been largely overlooked.

The Defiant (above, right), while slower than the more fêted Spitfire, was a two-seater aircraft with a gunner at the rear, in a swivelling turret with four machine guns, which gave formidable firepower. It was seen as essential against the threat of German bombers. It performed heroically at Dunkirk and the two Defiant squadrons served with distinctio­n during the Battle of Britain: 264 Squadron holds the record for the most number of confirmed ‘kills’ in a day; 141 Squadron, on the other hand, suffered the greatest loss of life and aircraft in a single combat.

History appears to have judged the Defiant a design failure, best forgotten. It is, however, Robert Verkaik’s wellargued contention that the Defiant was misused and mismanaged: deployed to frontline fighter stations as an independen­t fighter instead of a bomber destroyer working in tandem with the Hurricanes and Spitfires, it was marred by production delays and design flaws (why no bulletproo­f-glass canopy?) and a malfunctio­ning radio system.

Verkaik is an excellent guide, making his case with a restrained passion, taking us through the inter-war rearmament before cataloguin­g the muddled thinking, the political infighting, the inter-service and personalit­y rivalries.

His research was clearly a labour of love, leaving no Whitehall paper or airman’s letter unturned in his search for the truth, and he never forgets the human dimension behind the losses.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom