Insurer refused a refund when I couldn’t travel
R.C. writes: My wife and I have had insurance from Hiscox for many years, and for the year to July 2020 our annual travel policy cost £600. It has quoted £888 for another year, a whopping rise of nearly 50 per cent – and with pandemic cover excluded. I declined, to which Hiscox responded that it would not commit to covering us in the future. I then asked for a refund for the lockdown months but it refused point blank.
A RISE of nearly 50 per cent in premiums is huge, and I can understand why you turned it down. But the bottom line is that Hiscox is not obliged to insure you in the future, any more than you are obliged to accept the new premium. If Hiscox no longer wants your business, perhaps because you and your wife are elderly, then no matter how loyal you have been, it can turn its back on you and walk away.
But the question of refunds for what turned out to be a near-useless policy is a different matter. When Hiscox calculated its premiums a year or so ago, they were based on its own estimates of how many customers would travel, and how many would then make claims. Both those numbers have dropped like a stone.
I asked Hiscox how it justified keeping all of your premiums. If you had travelled against Government advice, Hiscox would have refused to meet any claim. So wasn’t Hiscox pocketing premiums without any risk of paying out? At first, Hiscox simply sidestepped the question. It told me: ‘Any trips booked would have been covered throughout the term of the policy.’
It added: ‘We would of course have provided a refund, had Mr C contacted us before his policy had ended to tell us he no longer needed the cover.’ As a ‘gesture of goodwill’, though, Hiscox said it would offer you £100 ‘for any confusion caused’.
But this did not answer the central question, so I pressed Hiscox again. Would it have met claims from people who had travelled during lockdown against Government advice?
This time the answer was a l i t t l e cl earer. Poli cyholders would have been covered for any cancellation losses, but if t hey had actually t ravelled, t hen Hiscox would not have covered them for anything else, such as loss of baggage, illness or accident abroad.
When travel restrictions began, Hiscox told me, ‘customers had the option to cancel their policy and receive a refund’. I do wonder how many Hiscox policyholders were aware of this.
Policy documents do say that annual policies can be cancelled at any time.
So Hiscox takes the view that it was up to all its policyholders to decide whether to claim a refund as soon as the Government ruled against travel. Hiscox would not draw this to their attention.
It told me: ‘ A broker would always be able to give advice on whether this would be right for an individual customer based on their circumstances.’
The outcome for you is that, in effect, Hiscox is telling you that you should have obtained professional advice from an insurance broker as soon as l ockdown began, t hen cancelled your policy to obtain a refund, rather than relying on Hiscox to make a refund because its risk of paying out had fallen dramatically.
Every Hiscox annual travel policyholder should take this to heart and call their broker tomorrow morning if they believe they might be in a similar position.
Hiscox added that its policy ‘ provided cover for essential travel’, which was still permitt e d. Any pol i c yhol der who believes their travel is essential – for example, to assist a sick relative abroad – should check with Hiscox now on whether it will meet any claim, rather than find out too late that it takes a different view of what counts as essential.