The National (Scotland)

Voter ID rule saw hundreds turned away from polling stations

-

Rutherglen election hit hardest by ‘unnecessar­y and damaging’ policy

HUNDREDS of voters were turned away from polling stations due to voter ID issues at the first by-election in Scotland where it was required, it can be revealed.

The ballot in Rutherglen and Hamilton West also saw the highest percentage of voters “permanentl­y” turned away due to not having the right identifica­tion out of all by-elections which took place after the new law was introduced last year.

The figures have raised fresh concerns about the impact of the controvers­ial requiremen­t ahead of the General Election, which will be the first time voters across Scotland will have to show photograph­ic ID to be able to cast their ballot.

The need for voters to show a form of identifica­tion before being issued with a ballot paper introduced by the Tories sparked a huge backlash, with accusation­s it would disenfranc­hise vulnerable groups to “tackle a problem that doesn’t exist”.

Figures obtained by the Sunday National show that nearly 300 people – 298 – were turned away from polling stations in Rutherglen and Hamilton West because of the rule, adding up to 1.47% of all polling station voters.

Out of these, 99 did not return and so did not vote – 0.49% of all polling station voters.

While the figures cannot be used to predict what will happen in the General Election, this percentage applied to four million voters across Scotland would add up to nearly 20,000 people.

And it is a higher figure compared to five other by-elections which took place last year where voter ID was required, with the percentage of “permanentl­y” turned-away voters ranging from 0.09% in Selby and Ainsty to 0.37% in Uxbridge and South Ruislip.

Meanwhile, notes on a meeting after the Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election involving South Lanarkshir­e Council obtained under a Freedom of Informatio­n (FOI) to the Electoral Commission found there were “definitely” reports of abuse towards staff over the issue of voter ID.

The notes said it “wasn’t a widespread problem”, but added that there was “one report of police having to speak to an elector but that wasn’t followed up as prosecutio­n”.

It added: “Think it was related to being turned away at 9.30pm, making it harder for them to vote.”

Dr Jess Garland, director of research and policy at the Electoral Reform Society, said: “These figures reveal a worrying trend emerging since voter ID became mandatory.

“Even one voter turned away because of voter ID is one too many but we are seeing large numbers, and some potentiall­y put off turning out in the first place.

“Rather than putting up barriers to voting, we should be restoring trust in politics and boosting engagement.

“Lessons must be learnt from the elections last year. The Government needs to scrap this unnecessar­y policy before more damage is done.”

The local elections in England in May were the first in Britain which required voters to show ID under the Elections Act 2022.

ANALYSIS carried out afterwards found that 0.25% of voters at these elections were not able to because of ID requiremen­ts, equivalent to around 14,000 people. A further 4% of non-voters said they had not gone to the polls because of it.

The Electoral Commission said some people found it harder than others to show accepted voter ID, including disabled people, younger voters, people from ethnic minority communitie­s, and the unemployed.

Ahead of the local election in England, the Commission had launched a public awareness campaign, which correspond­ence revealed by the FOI said could account for the higher rate of people being turned away in the Scottish by-election.

It said: “Ultimately, those voters at the by-elections in England will have seen all the TV advertisin­g we carried out ahead of the English local elections in May last year so it’s not surprising that there was a lower rate of voters turned away there.

“Given the absence of TV advertisin­g in your area [Scotland], it’s actually quite impressive what was achieved through social media and partnershi­p work.”

The Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election was won by Labour’s Michael Shanks, with 17,845 votes

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom