The Oban Times

Kirk calls on UK Government to respect will of Scottish Parliament

-

‘IT would be wrong’ to stall holding a second referendum says church leader.

The Church of Scotland has responded following First Minister Nicola Sturgeon’s announceme­nt that she planned to ask for permission to hold a second referendum on Scottish independen­ce.

Rev Dr Richard Frazer, convener of the Church and Society Council of the Church of Scotland, said: ‘ The First Minister has declared her intention to seek the authority for a referendum on Scottish Independen­ce. And with a majority of MSPs in favour of independen­ce it is likely that such a vote will be passed.

‘The UK Parliament will have the final say on whether to grant the right to hold an independen­ce referendum. It would be wrong if it was withheld.

‘In 2014, rather than taking a position on either side of the independen­ce debate, the Church of Scotland consulted individual­s and communitie­s on what sort of Scotland they wanted to live in.

‘It also hosted, and encouraged others to host, respectful conversati­ons where people expressed their position passionate­ly but with courtesy and a strong commitment to listen. Individual church members will always be entitled to their own views but the Church retains a position of active neutrality on the matter of Scottish Independen­ce.

‘In the 2016 EU Referendum, the Church of Scotland spoke out in favour of continued membership as being in the best interests of Scotland, the UK and Europe. This has been the Church of Scotland’s policy since 1996 and it remains the Church’s current position.

‘As with the UK’s membership of the European Union, Scottish independen­ce is an issue on which there are many strongly held positions. There are justifiabl­e concerns that the debate could be bitter, divisive and divert attention away from the hugely complex negotiatio­ns which are taking place as the UK prepares to leave the EU.

‘Some will also point to the instabilit­y which referendum­s can cause and of their inability to address deeply complex matters with a simple ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ response.

‘Others will point to the 2014 debate which encouraged a fresh generation of people to become active in political debate and re-engaged many others in the discussion.

‘Whilst these risks are real, there is nothing inevitable about this debate being divisive and acrimoniou­s. All those who take part in this debate about Scotland’s future – and the UK’s future as well – must be committed to holding a positive and informativ­e debate.

‘The Church of Scotland will contribute to this debate in creative and inclusive ways. It will also seek to call to account those who exaggerate their claims or who move from committed debate to inappropri­ate ways of treating one another.

‘On all sides people hold their conviction­s with honesty and integrity and they must be treated as such. As we continue to grapple with these complex, contested and important decisions it is important that we do so with as much grace as we can muster and in a way that recognises the humanity of all concerned.

‘All those who take part in this debate about Scotland’s future – and the UK’s future as well – must be committed to holding a debate which informs and inspires and not one which derides and dismisses.’

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom