The Oban Times

Approval of zipwire applicatio­n beggars belief

-

On May 9 this year Highland Council declared a climate emergency. On December 4, the same council granted permission for a multiple zipwire attraction at Kinlochlev­en.

I am dismayed that no considerat­ion was given at the council meeting to the wider issue of the implicatio­ns of allowing a proposal in this location to go ahead.

Local and national opinion, including the Woodland Trust, Mountainee­ring Scotland and the Ramblers’ Associatio­n all expressed reservatio­ns.

More than 1,600 people agreed: ‘Kinlochlev­en is not an amusement park but is part of Scotland’s wild land heritage. Time spent in nature is free for all to enjoy and should not be ruined by a permanent, ugly, expensive structure that will only benefit a small minority.’

Veteran outdoor pursuits authority Cameron McNeish stated via his Twitter account that he is ‘saddened to hear of plans for a zipwire in Kinlochlev­en ... Kinlochlev­en’s potential is better than cheap thrills like that’.

Highland councillor­s granted permission for this developmen­t while repeatedly asserting it is ‘difficult to say’ what the impact will be, as it is an ‘unknown quantity’.

Councillor Andrew Baxter referenced his own recent enjoyable family holiday experience on a zipwire and Councillor Carolyn Caddick based her judgement on her own experience of her children’s zipwire in her back garden.

I am flabbergas­ted our councillor­s imagine these subjective inanities are relevant to informing the decision-making process.

I am further disappoint­ed that Councillor Baxter, who ‘understand­s the area particular­ly well’ and who was at pains to show his awareness of the controvers­y surroundin­g this proposal, saw fit to recommend the constraint­s on operating hours – proposed by Environmen­tal Health to protect the local community – were lifted, thereby giving residents little respite from the noise and disturbanc­e.

Only one councillor raised the issue of the carbon footprint of the developmen­t. There was no debate on the carbon emissions which will arise as a result of the 200-plus visitors per day that the developers claim will come to the village and the huge 35-seater all-terrain SUVs that will be carrying them backwards and forwards through the village at 15-minute intervals.

No questions were raised as to how the wires are to be put in place, given that many structures like this drag their cables along the ground before lifting them and attaching them to the towers.

This would have a significan­t impact on the ancient woodland which the structure will span.

Presumably, this is part of the ‘unknown quantity’ which explore.

Kinlochlev­en Community Council, the elected body for the village, has remained neutral on the proposal in recognitio­n of the divided opinion surroundin­g it. However, opponents have been derided, mocked and, in some cases, threatened on social media, with one supporter of the developmen­t who holds the council is happy not to

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom