The Oldie

Shaken, not stirred, by 007

And Mary Clive recalls a disastrous 1938 holiday in Capri with a sunburnt Fleming

- Mary Clive

From autumn 1937 to May 1938, I dined with Ian once a week, and was absolutely fascinated by him. Every time he was different and every time one said, ‘This is the real Ian.’ It was like peeling an onion. You peeled off layer after layer, and in the middle there was nothing. He was an enormously difficult crossword puzzle. He was glittering but had no heat; he was elusive; he was lovely but useless, like a Christmas-tree ornament.

Ian was the best-looking man I have ever seen, with a broken nose and a damned soul/ fallen angel expression. He was slightly round-shouldered but with marvellous legs – appreciate­d only in bathing dress.

I had a walk-out with him – although throughout our acquaintan­ce sex never did rear its ugly head. He turned his best side up when talking to me, but he found it a strain and could not keep it up for very long.

By the time I got to know him in the 1930s, he had become a stockbroke­r in Rowe & Pitman. Ian was thoroughly ashamed of being a stockbroke­r as he thought it a ghastly profession.

He would tell me stories — nearly always stories about himself and a girl, and they were so vividly told that one could see everything happening.

His attitude to his affairs was ingenuous excitement during the pursuit, naughty triumph and then contempt and repulsion. Like many Don Juans, Ian did not like women, and they brought out the worst in him. He wanted women to behave badly – to punch his nose in a masculine way and to be slippery as he was. He was very feminine and needed a masculine-style partner.

In spring 1938, we had a row. I told him I liked him only as a substitute for the man I was really in love with (Meysey Clive, later my husband). It was typical that he enjoyed this row – indeed any row – and he never asked the name of my real passion nor anything about him.

He wasn’t interested in people or in my private life. After the war, when I mentioned that the novelist Anthony Powell was my brother-in-law, he was very surprised, having never heard of my sister Violet. He never asked how many children I had, nor did he enquire about them. Ian liked odd, impersonal facts.

He corrected the proofs of Brought Up and Brought Out [Mary Clive’s 1938 memoir]. This he was quite excellent at, being very quick to detect lapses into whimsy, misspellin­gs, grammar mistakes and errors of fact. He knew that the right name for the people who inquire into the occult was the Society for Psychical Research. He would have appreciate­d it if I had dedicated the book to him, but his reputation was so bad that I did not want my name connected with his and no one knew we were having a walk-out.

In spring 1938, he went to Capri to recuperate after appendicit­is. I had been planning to go on a Nazi ‘Strength Through Joy’ cruise (of all things!) as a journalist, but it fell through – mercifully, it seems now – so I went to Capri instead.

When I was getting into Ian’s wagonlit, looking at the placards for Hitler and Mussolini, I knew the expedition was a failure. I had a headache after sitting up all night. When I took a couple of aspirin, Ian made a fuss. It amused him to play at pretending aspirin was a sinister drug, but it struck me as too stupid.

Our respective attitudes to abroad were poles apart – mine taking it as bathing, to float in and enjoy; his as a game of Red Indians.

On Capri, there were two places to have dinner. In two days, one had exhausted all the possibilit­ies. The company was dingy in the extreme. A frozen calm descended.

Besides being intensely bored, I found my position made difficult by Ian’s being insanely jealous and possessive. Though I gave him complete freedom, Ian resented my talking to anyone or even going sightseein­g or appearing to enjoy myself.

Particular­ly disagreeab­le was an expedition to Vesuvius, chiefly owing to Ian’s behaving as though he were climbing Everest or crossing the Sahara.

The only compensati­on for the boredom of the month was looking at Ian in a blackand-white dressing gown with a wide red sash, against the blue sea, his face more fallen angel than ever, burnt nearly black.

The war began and Ian, with that instinct for self-preservati­on which ran parallel with that instinct for burning his fingers, got attached to the Navy.

By this time, we had very much drifted apart. I went round to his flat once. Ian seemed very excited and was apparently enjoying himself and amused to know a lot of secrets. I did not see him again until long after the war, but I heard he was much appreciate­d in wartime by his chief, being able, according to custom, to fascinate middle-aged men. He also had quite a lot of naval characteri­stics, being punctual, tidy and accurate.

During his Jamaica honeymoon in 1952, he wrote Casino Royale – an idea that had been swimming in his head before the war. It was published the following spring.

The last time I saw Ian, he was very excited about it. He had made himself into a company in anticipati­on of enormous sales (I pityingly thought such success unlikely). He said ‘It’s heady stuff,’ referring to this literary enterprise, making no attempt to conceal his delight.

I have just read the bed scene in The Spy Who Loved Me. The difference­s that strike one between Bond and Ian are (a) when Ian went to bed with a girl only once, it was because he was disgusted by sex and despised the girl he slept with; (b) his forte was entangling women emotionall­y, quite apart from bed, so that they were fond of him for 20 to 30 years.

Bond is a daydream of absolute irresponsi­bility. A world where nobody civilises you. None of the girls is annoyed; none of the girls has a baby. Bond can even get married without having to get married. There are no repercussi­ons. It’s a dream of power without responsibi­lity. Everything, anything, you do is perfectly splendid, just because of you. How could I be friends with a man who wrote such an absurd book?

When one of Ian’s films was shown at the cinema at Piccadilly Circus, I congratula­ted him on having his name in lights and he said I must come and see him and Ann, his wife. But the invitation wasn’t on, really; warm but vague, leaving me to take the initiative. And, after that, he died.

Apart from being ill and quarrellin­g with his wife, Ian must have hated the prospect of growing old. We all do, but to a ladykiller and man vain of his appearance it must have been especially bitter. Till he was 40, he was a live wire stirring up the old fogies. And to be an old fogy himself!

Ian was not a snob but couldn’t resist the advances of the rich and the grand. If you wanted to interest him in a girl, you wouldn’t say she was a duchess in her own right, or a millionair­ess. You’d say she was the niece of Stalin’s mistress.

He was a life-enhancer at one moment, a killjoy at another; a romantic who wanted life to be a fairy story. Generally ultraconse­rvative, he could do enterprisi­ng things. Generally parsimonio­us, he could be generous. If he had married a nice girl, he might have settled down to humdrum domesticit­y – but he would never have married a nice girl.

Ian’s great attraction (besides being exigeant) was his super-cosiness. You felt you had met a soulmate, a twin stolen from the cradle, someone with whom you could really relax, be natural and tell all.

The next time you met, he would be so aloof that you would have to search for topics of conversati­on. It was infuriatin­g – he understood one completely, but knew nothing about one.

He liked being top dog but wasn’t really a leader, or even bossy. He was the natural prey of tigresses but cherished dreams of dollies – the girls in his books are all adoring slaves. Sex nauseated him – other people’s affairs shocked and disgusted him. Girls who didn’t fall for him felt antagonist­ic.

The best side of him was idealistic and unworldly, but it was too small a side to build his life around.

He could not resist the world when it came after him. He was sucked into Vanity Fair though he despised it. He was false to his better self, which doubtless is what made him unhappy when success came.

No Time to Die is released on 3rd April

‘He was the natural prey of tigresses but cherished dreams of dollies’

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Below: Ian and Peter Fleming building sandcastle­s in the early 1910s
Below: Ian and Peter Fleming building sandcastle­s in the early 1910s

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom