The Press and Journal (Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire)

‘Holyrood standing in way of rail renaissanc­e’

Transport: Campaigner­s claim government blocks progress

- Full story, Page 2

Transport campaigner­s have accused the Scottish Government of standing in the way of a “railway renaissanc­e” in the north-east.

Railfuture Scotland has suggested the only thing blocking a major transport overhaul in Aberdeensh­ire is a lack of funding from Holyrood.

Transport campaigner­s have accused the Scottish Government of standing in the way of a “railway renaissanc­e” in the northeast.

Railfuture Scotland has suggested the only thing blocking a major transport overhaul in Aberdeensh­ire is a lack of funding from Holyrood.

In a package of proposals which will be put on show in Aberdeen this weekend, the organisati­on’s vicechairm­an Roderick McDougall calls for new lines to Peterhead, Fraserburg­h, Oldmeldrum and Banchory.

The chartered civil engineer said that along with extra stations on the network, the new rail infrastruc­ture would bring about a significan­t shift from road to rail transport.

This would boost the local and national economy as well as protecting the environmen­t, he said.

New stations are proposed for Bucksburn, Persley, Kittybrews­ter, Cove, Kintore and Newtonhill as well as Ellon, Maud, Peterhead and Fraserburg­h.

Now Railfuture – a national campaign group led by several former railway company bosses and engineers – has called for their “bold vision” to be funded by the government.

Mr McDougall said: “Whereas it is Network Rail’s job to look after and maintain the existing network, and Scot Rail’s job to operate passenger trains on it in accordance with their franchise, there appears to be no one charged with looking at extending and improving the network.

“This is a government responsibi­lity which they are shirking by passing it on to cash-strapped regional transport authoritie­s and local councils without giving them either the authority or the financial ability to fulfil it. It is only pressure groups like ours that are trying to ‘kick-start’ a renaissanc­e in railway improvemen­ts.”

But government body Transport Scotland has wholly rejected claims it is not doing enough to support rail infrastruc­ture in the north-east.

Last night a spokesman said: “We do not recognise or agree with these comments or views.

“Recent industry planning documents, including the Scotland Route Study published in the summer, demonstrat­e the success of our railways, with strong growth in demand for rail in Scotland predicted to continue, leading to an increasing­ly busy railway that will require investment in rolling stock and infrastruc­ture to support faster and more frequent and reliable journeys.”

He said that investing in Scotland’s railways is a “key priority” and that 95million journeys were made on Scot Rail last year. However, the body acknowledg­ed that improvemen­ts can be made, with the spokesman adding: “We recognise there are challenges ahead and choices to be made around future investment and the planning process for these is under way.”

Transport Scotland is due to consult with stakeholde­rs over the winter about rail investment beyond 2019.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Portlethen
Portlethen

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom