The Press and Journal (Inverness, Highlands, and Islands)

Scotland’s Greens have given up on environmen­tal issues

Party appears to be more interested in nationalis­m than the climate emergency

- John Ferry ● John Ferry is a regular commentato­r on Scottish politics and economics, a contributo­r to think tank These Islands, and finance spokesman for the Scottish Liberal Democrats

The report was eye-openingly blunt: “The Scottish Government is failing to achieve Scotland’s ambitious climate goals.” That is line one of the Climate Change Committee’s (CCC) new report on Scotland’s progress on reducing emissions.

The CCC is the official independen­t body set up to advise our politician­s on progress made in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. It is a serious group, made up of top experts. What it says matters, and what it is saying about Scotland should concern all of us.

“Annual emissions targets have repeatedly been missed and the publicatio­n of Scotland’s draft Climate Change Plan has been delayed. As such, there is still no comprehens­ive delivery strategy for meeting future emissions targets, and actions continue to fall far short of what is legally required,” says the CCC.

The Scottish Government has a legallybin­ding target to reduce emissions by 75% by 2030, compared with 1990 levels.

Scotland has missed eight of its annual emissions reduction targets in the past 12 years, and the CCC believes the Scottish Government is “lacking a comprehens­ive strategy that outlines the actions and polices required to achieve the 2030 target”.

By the end of this decade, the CCC would like to see Scotland treble the pace of rolling out public electric vehicle charging points, reduce car traffic by 20%; increase heat-pump installati­on rates by a factor of at least 13, and double onshore wind capacity. It also says woodland creation will need to more than double by the mid2020s, while peatland restoratio­n rates need to increase significan­tly.

My immediate thought after reading the report was: Where are the Scottish Greens? The party joined the Scottish Government in August 2021, making big promises about tackling the climate emergency.

Why hasn’t it used its influence to force the Scottish Government to publish its draft climate change plan, which it promised to do by late-2023? Shouldn’t the Greens be threatenin­g to walk out of governing if that plan is not prioritise­d and published ASAP?

Perhaps Lorna Slater and Patrick Harvie, the co-leaders of the Scottish Greens, have grown too used to their ministeria­l salaries and other trappings of office.

More likely, the party’s failure on what should be their defining mission points to another uncomforta­ble truth: the Scottish Greens long ago swapped environmen­talism for nationalis­m.

In the time that the party has been in government with the SNP, the Scottish Government has managed to produce no fewer than 12 papers on independen­ce, while failing to publish its plan on climate change. That tells you all you need to know about where the Scottish Government’s – and, by extension, the Scottish Greens’ – priorities sit.

The Scottish Greens’ embrace of nationalis­m has led it to the extraordin­ary position of placing a higher priority on breaking up the UK than saving the planet. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that advocating for Scottish secession stands in direct opposition to achieving net zero.

Are we to believe that a Scottish Government grappling with the technical challenges of creating all the infrastruc­ture needed to run an independen­t state would have the institutio­nal capacity to deliver on net-zero aims? It clearly would not.

Neither would it have the fiscal capacity. Around the time of the Scottish Greens coming into government, the UK’s Office for Budget Responsibi­lity (OBR) produced a report in which it estimated it will cost £1.4 trillion in real terms over 30 years for the UK to achieve net zero, with the state coughing up around £350 billion of that.

Meanwhile, this month, Scotland’s version of the OBR, the Scottish Fiscal Commission, produced a report which showed that more public spending per person will be needed in Scotland because we have lots of forests and peatland, and a relatively large land mass per capita.

It will cost billions of pounds for Scotland to achieve net zero, yet the Scottish Government’s key priority is to cut us out of our UK fiscal union, a move that would lead to austerity budgets the like of which we’ve never known. Never mind paying for net zero – making next month’s public sector wages bill would be challengin­g enough.

Cutting us out of the UK also risks breaking up our electricit­y market. The British power market works on the basis that sparsely populated Scotland exports excess electricit­y to the heavily populated south, while subsidies for Scotland’s renewables industry and associated infrastruc­ture flow north. Smash that market, and you cut off those subsidies, which would be catastroph­ic for Scottish renewable energy.

The CCC report is not just a call to arms on climate-change action, it is also a warning of the dangers of Scotland’s environmen­tal movement getting hijacked for other purposes – namely a separatist policy that threatens to scupper our net zero ambitions.

Cutting us out of UK also risks breaking up our electricit­y market

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? BAD RECORD: Scottish Greens co-leaders Lorna Slater and Patrick Harvie, first and second left, have the political limelight.
BAD RECORD: Scottish Greens co-leaders Lorna Slater and Patrick Harvie, first and second left, have the political limelight.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom