The Scotsman

Tax is not answer

-

Dr Stewart Clark is among many whose detestatio­n of the SNP, and of independen­ce, blinkers their vision on Westminste­r-created constituti­onal matters that dominate Holyrood (Letters, 25 July).

Their problem is that the constituti­on does not permit much by way of interpreta­tion – it is written in the statute, so it is not so much a case of “blaming” Westminste­r, as attributin­g responsibi­lity there.

I’m sure Dr Clark did not intend to mislead when he linked the 2014 referendum with the so-called new powers which do not come in until 2017 – these are the Smith proposals in the 2016 Scotland Act. Leaving aside Calman, the powers we have now are basically those operating when we had the Labour-led coalition from 1999 to 2007, but I do not recall any criticism of that regime and of the Scottish economy then. Of course, then we had a “partnershi­p”, as John (now Lord) Reid never stopped telling us, between Westminste­r Labour and Holyrood Labour – and we all know where that ended up: Labour out, SNP in.

There is a major contradict­ion (despite his comments about Catriona Clark and me) in Dr Clark blaming the Westminste­r Tory government for its budget and for public sector austerity in paying off the debt, when Labour’s £160bn 2010 deficit created it. His challenge to the SNP to increase tax (which would apply to whichever party was in power at Holyrood) compounds the austerity issue: to compensate the cuts would simply pass the austerity into taxpayers’ pockets! Paradoxica­lly, that would not result in any additional spending. Furthermor­e, any cuts from Westminste­r would enhance our viability.

DOUGLAS R MAYER Thomson Crescent, Currie,

Midlothian

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom